Subscribe

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Motorsport prime

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Edition

Australia
Breaking news

Control tyre preferred option for Bathurst 12 Hour

A control tyre deal hasn’t yet been signed for the Bathurst 12 Hour, but Event Director John Casey says the switch to a single manufacturer is the preferred outcome.

Pirelli truck
Pirelli tyres
Pirelli detail
Pirelli tyres Compound
#1 Nissan Motorsports Nissan GT-R Nismo GT3: Rick Kelly, Katsumasa Chiyo, Florian Strauss
#1 Nissan Motorsports Nissan GT-R Nismo GT3: Rick Kelly, Katsumasa Chiyo, Florian Strauss
#65 Daytona Sportscar Coupe: Jamie Augustine, Ben Schoots, Dean Lillie
Podium: race winners Shane van Gisbergen, Alvaro Parente, Jonathon Webb, Tekno Autosports, second place Rick Kelly, Katsumasa Chiyo, Florian Strauss, Nissan Motorsports, third place Steven Kane, Guys Smith, Matt Bell, Bentley Team M-Sport

Rumours have surfaced that Pirelli is in the box seat to nab a single tyre supplier deal for the 2017 running of the fast-growing GT3 enduro, after both the Italian manufacturer and Michelin supplied teams at this year’s 12 Hour.

Pirelli’s motorsport boss Paul Hembery and 12 Hour Event Director John Casey were at Spa for the 24 Hour race just under a fortnight ago, but Casey says that “there isn’t a deal” with any manufacturer.

He did confirm, however, that a single supplier was the ideal outcome for the event from a Balance of Performance perspective.

“I come back to why would you do a single tyre deal, as opposed to a multiple tyre deal,” said Casey.

“We adopted the Balance of Performance, because it’s a fantastic structure and platform for competitors. It provides massive confidence from the competitors in terms of the event.

“And the BoP is based on a single tyre. So to introduce multiple tyres into the equation makes the BoP less perfect. It’s an extra variable in a formula where you’re actually trying to take away variables.

“On the one hand it takes away a variable and let Balance of Performance do its thing, on the other hand it takes away a variable which is in some dimensions interesting. On balance, however, for me the BoP working properly is a better compromise.”

Casey added that the ideal scenario would be to have a deal in place sooner rather than later, but that it won’t be rushed.

“With these things the earlier you do them the better, but you’ve got to do them properly, and respectively with all parties.”

Be part of Motorsport community

Join the conversation
Previous article Spa 24 winner eyeing Bathurst seat
Next article Sydney to host new 10-hour endurance race

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Motorsport prime

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Edition

Australia