Breaking news

Formula 1

Mercedes, Renault: F1 risks needless arms race with new engines

Renault and Mercedes believe Formula 1 risks opening up a needless spending arms race and having a less competitive grid with the new engine regulations that have been proposed for 2021.

Jonathan Noble

Jonathan Noble

Edited: Nov 1, 2017, 5:47 PM

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Add as a preferred source

 Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 W08, Nico Hulkenberg, Renault Sport F1 Team RS17

In the wake of a meeting between engine manufacturers, the FIA and the F1 Group to discuss a vision for future engine rules, there are concerns that the ideas put forward are not what grand prix racing needs.

While the engine proposals revealed on Tuesday appear similar to the current versions – keeping the same 1.6-litre engine but ditching the MGU-H for a more powerful MGU-K – the changes are enough to force manufacturers to build all-new engines.

In fact, Renault and Mercedes are in agreement that F1 would be better off focusing on the fans' desire for louder and more powerful engines through simple rule changes to the current power units.

This could be achieved through a number of measures, including raising the rev limit and ditching fuel restrictions, rather than requiring hundreds of millions of dollars spent on all-new power units.

It is this aspect that has particularly alarmed two of the current race-winning manufacturers.

Renault F1 managing director Cyril Abiteboul told Motorsport.com: "Despite maybe what FOM and FIA would say – what is put forward is a new engine. It is a new engine with lots of gimmicks, but it is a new engine. And that is really for me the most fundamental element.

"We need to be extremely careful because each time we come up with a new regulation that will come up with a new product – new engine or new chassis – we all know what is the impact. It is going to open an arms race again, and it will open up the field once again."

Mercedes motorsport boss Toto Wolff told Motorsport.com: "When you look at the bullet points presented, it looks like no big change and is superficially similar, but there is massive change in there.

"It is an all-new engines, with new harvesting and deployment strategies for energy.

"All of us accept that development costs and sound need to be tackled, but we shouldn't be running away with creativity in coming up with new concepts, because it will trigger parallel development costs over the next three years."

Louder faster engines

Ross Brawn, Formula One Managing Director of Motorsports and Cyril Abiteboul, Renault Sport F1 Managing Director at the McLaren motorhome

Ross Brawn, Formula One Managing Director of Motorsports and Cyril Abiteboul, Renault Sport F1 Managing Director at the McLaren motorhome

Photo by: Sutton Images

Renault and Mercedes both accept that the current F1 engines need to be improved - especially in sound terms – but they think achieving that can be done without an all-new design.

They concur that lifting the rev-limit by 3000rpm, plus ditching the fuel limit and increasing the fuel flow rate, would achieve such an aim, as well as bring more power.

Wolff said: "I think you will increase the quality of sound by having a new point that is 3000rpm higher than current level. It would be a very different sound and this is an area that we are obliged to look into."

Renault has even suggested that with such changes not requiring new engines, they could be introduced as early as 2019 if all the manufacturers were in agreement.

Abiteboul added: "Renault's proposal for six months now has been to keep the current engine but waiving any type of fuel restriction in terms of fuel quantity, plus moving the fuel flow limitation and also the rev limit.

"The great thing about that proposal is that you could do that without having to wait until 2021. The world is changing quickly, by 2022, a number of car makers will have moved to something that is much more electrified than today, so I think the timing to decide now what we want for the period 2021 to 2026 is maybe not appropriate."

Wolff suggests that with power unit performance now converging – with three manufacturers fighting it out for pole and victory in the last race – there is a risk that F1 realises too late that tweaked version of the current units would have been a better bet for the long-term future.

"We are not learning from our past historic experiences," he said. "It should be about optimising the deficits we have with the current engines… if you tackle those deficits and have a convergence over the next 24 months there is not a lot wrong. The costs have been spent."

New Manufacturers

Toto Wolff, Executive Director Mercedes AMG F1

Toto Wolff, Executive Director Mercedes AMG F1

Photo by: Steve Etherington / LAT Images

While the FIA and the F1 Group are hoping that new engine rules will attract new manufacturers, Wolff thinks it is a mistake to ignore the interests of those currently competing.

"First of all, F1 needs to be stay attractive for the current engine suppliers and then F1 should be attractive for new entrants," he said. "This is the order of priority.

"We need to enter into a dialogue now to come up with a concept that functions for everyone, and we are keen to enter into that dialogue."

Abiteboul agreed that the proposals put forward must only be viewed as a starting point for what will be lengthy discussions.

"I think it is not a bad thing to have a vision because I think it was a long time coming to understand what was Liberty's stance on a number of topics," he said. "It is good to get a starting point; but clearly we see that as a starting point and hopefully not as the end point."

Ferrari has not yet spoken about the proposals, while Honda has declined to get involved in the debate.

A Honda spokesman said: "As nothing has been specifically agreed among the related parties, Honda will not comment on this matter at this stage."

We want your opinion!

What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?

Take our 5 minute survey.

- The Motorsport.com Team

Read and post comments

Read also :

Share Or Save This Story

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Previous article Mexican GP won't accept June date switch

Next article Red Bull ready to wait on Ricciardo

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

View More & Comment

More from

Jonathan Noble



Brundle awarded OBE in King’s New Year’s honours

Formula 1

Formula 1

Brundle awarded OBE in King’s New Year’s honours



The new rules dilemma that will define the 2025 F1 season

Formula 1

Formula 1

The new rules dilemma that will define the 2025 F1 season



Verstappen issues Red Bull title warning in push for RB21 progress

Formula 1

Formula 1

Australian GP

Verstappen issues Red Bull title warning in push for RB21 progress

Latest news



Franco Colapinto urges fans to stop the abuse: “You’re not helping me or my future”

Formula 1

F1 Formula 1

Singapore GP

1 h

Franco Colapinto urges fans to stop the abuse: “You’re not helping me or my future”



Gresini: New MotoGP rules won't increase gap between factory and satellite teams

MotoGP

MGP MotoGP

Indonesian GP

1 h

Gresini: New MotoGP rules won't increase gap between factory and satellite teams



Tristan McKee joins JR Motorsports in 2027 with future plans for full-time ride

NASCAR O'Reilly

NOAP NASCAR O'Reilly

Phoenix II

1 h

Tristan McKee joins JR Motorsports in 2027 with future plans for full-time ride



Colton Herta eyes potential Indy 500 return and IMSA enduros as 2027 plans remain in flux

FIA F2

F2 FIA F2 1 h

Colton Herta eyes potential Indy 500 return and IMSA enduros as 2027 plans remain in flux

Feature

Discover prime content



Lights, Camara, action: How Haas picked F1's latest rookie for 2027

Formula 1

Singapore GP

By Jake Boxall-Legge

Lights, Camara, action: How Haas picked F1's latest rookie for 2027



Employing team orders can simply be a matter of common sense

Formula 1

By Kevin Turner

Employing team orders can simply be a matter of common sense



Why Christian Horner sees history repeating itself for Adrian Newey at Aston Martin

Formula 1

Singapore GP

By Ronald Vording

Why Christian Horner sees history repeating itself for Adrian Newey at Aston Martin



Laurent Mekies under the microscope: How different is his leadership at Red Bull from Christian Horner?

Formula 1

Singapore GP

By Ronald Vording

Laurent Mekies under the microscope: How different is his leadership at Red Bull from Christian Horner?

Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.

From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.

You have 2 options:

Subscribe now Already subscribed? Sign in here

Already disabled your adblocker?
Reload page

Manage Alerts

Subscribe