Formula 1
F1 ready for talks to revise cost cap rules
Formula 1 chiefs are lined up for discussions with teams about potential changes to the cost cap rules to help smaller squads catch up, Motorsport.com has learned.
Jonathan Noble
Edited: Mar 26, 2023, 10:01 AM
Copy link
Share on Viber
While the introduction of a cost cap since the start of 2021 is widely viewed as having been a success in closing up the field, there are some areas where its scope is felt to be too restrictive.
While it has helped in not allowing the bigger teams to spend their way to a huge advantage, equally there are aspects to it that have prevented smaller outfits from making the gains they want.
One of the issues that has gained traction in recent months is the fact that teams are strictly limited on capital expenditure – so there is not much freedom to improve infrastructure back at base.
While teams can build new factories, and a specific exemption has been allowed in the cost cap rules for new wind tunnels, any other investment needed to improve equipment has to be included in the generic cost cap limit that teams battle to stay under.
This means that teams which had the best infrastructure in place at the start of the cap have a locked in advantage, and those whose investment had fallen behind face the prospect of needing to divert money away from car performance if they want to improve their facilities.
It has emerged, however, that preliminary discussions have taken place about teams being given greater freedoms in terms of capital expenditure – so they do have the ability to improve facilities at their factories.
Motorsport.com understands that the matter was discussed at the most recent Formula 1 Commission meeting, with Williams team boss James Vowles particularly keen for there to be changes to the rules in this area.
With a number of rivals supporting the basic idea, plus the FIA and FOM open to the prospect, it is understood that a more detailed analysis of potential changes to the capital expenditure allowances is being prepared for further discussions in the next few weeks.
Speaking about the matter, Vowles said it was essential for the future health of F1 that small teams were given the means to improve their facilities if they have fallen behind.
“I personally think if we want a meritocracy, we need the ability for my team to be given the chance to catch up with some of the big teams and have the same resources,” he explained.
Stefano Domenicali, CEO, Formula 1
Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images
Vowles said that one of the surprises he found when joining Williams was that it lacked a number of systems that are found at bigger squads – and which cannot be upgraded without it eating in to the yearly cost cap allowance.
“There are some what I would consider basics, which are in place in other teams and have been since almost 15 years,” he said.
“For example, there are software systems that allow you to properly understand where all your parts are, and they simply don't exist [at Williams].
“As a result of that, what impresses me is that before I joined, they've built the car you see in front of you, 15,000 pieces coming together fitting, working, and seemingly going around the track fairly quickly. That's an incredible accomplishment.
“But clearly, it’s not how we can move forward. So we need systems in place and structures in place.”
While the idea of more freedom for capital expenditure would help the smallest teams most of all, bigger squads are understood to be in favour of it, pending the final details.
For a rule change to go through for 2024, it would require six of the current teams to back it – a level that appears to be possible to reach. If eight teams support it then the rules could change for this year.
Alpine team principal Otmar Szafnauer agreed that the current capital expenditure limits were unfair.
“What a cap ex cost cap does is it solidifies some inherent inequities,” he said.
“If you were a small team and didn't have a great wind tunnel, for example, and you couldn’t build one, you're screwed forever. That is why there's dispensation for new tunnels.
“And I think there are other infrastructure and tools underneath the tunnel that should be treated the same. Things like brake dynos, and full car dynos, that the big teams have and a small team doesn't.
“If you don't allow that expenditure, then that inequity is there forever. That means you're screwed forever and I think that's wrong.”
Read Also:
- Why McLaren's revamp is not just about its 2023 F1 car struggles
- Why Red Bull's biggest F1 adversary is now itself
- Mercedes explains approach to changing F1 car concept
We want your opinion!
What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?
Take our 5 minute survey.
- The Motorsport.com Team
Read and post comments
Read also :
Share Or Save This Story
Copy link
Share on Viber
Previous article Ocon: Alpine "not satisfied" with current F1 pace
Next article Horner: Red Bull has to "make hay" before rivals catch up
Top Comments
There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?
View More & Comment
More from
Jonathan Noble
Brundle awarded OBE in King’s New Year’s honours
Formula 1
Formula 1
Brundle awarded OBE in King’s New Year’s honours
The new rules dilemma that will define the 2025 F1 season
Formula 1
Formula 1
The new rules dilemma that will define the 2025 F1 season
Verstappen issues Red Bull title warning in push for RB21 progress
Formula 1
Formula 1
Australian GP
Verstappen issues Red Bull title warning in push for RB21 progress
Latest news
IndyCar 2026 season review: ECR
IndyCar
Indy IndyCar 13 h
IndyCar 2026 season review: ECR
Toto Wolff reflects on Mercedes’ non-title years: ‘We weren’t complete losers’
Formula 1
F1 Formula 1
Sao Paulo GP
13 h
Toto Wolff reflects on Mercedes’ non-title years: ‘We weren’t complete losers’
Renger van der Zande moves to IMSA’s LMP2 class full-time with Tower Motorsports
IMSA
IMSA IMSA 14 h
Renger van der Zande moves to IMSA’s LMP2 class full-time with Tower Motorsports
Nick Sanchez will compete for 2027 NASCAR Truck title with McAnally-Hilgemann
NASCAR Truck
NSTR NASCAR Truck
Homestead
14 h
Nick Sanchez will compete for 2027 NASCAR Truck title with McAnally-Hilgemann
Feature
Discover prime content
Top 10 F1 cars of the 1970s
Formula 1
By Kevin Turner
Top 10 F1 cars of the 1970s
Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
You have 2 options:
- Become a subscriber.
- Disable your adblocker.
Subscribe now Already subscribed? Sign in here
Already disabled your adblocker?
Reload page
Manage Alerts
Subscribe