Formula 1

F1 teams agree qualifying is priority in regulation review; happy with races

Team principals are praising the spectacle so far, but the ‘lift and coast’ technique during flying laps is prompting calls for possible changes

Roberto Chinchero

Roberto Chinchero

Published: Mar 19, 2026, 6:43 PM

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Add as a preferred source

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari

Photo by: Rudy Carezzevoli / Getty Images

Formula 1’s team principals have met to review findings from the Australian and Chinese Grands Prix weekends as the championship’s new regulations remain under scrutiny.

According to reports, all present agreed that the races were of a high standard in terms of on-track action and were happy with the response from the public and fans and thus not currently a cause for concern.

Any necessary adjustments will be assessed without haste, eliminating the risk of a knee-jerk reaction creating further problems.

But qualifying is being pinpointed as a priority for review, with no shortage of criticism in both Melbourne and Shanghai, as drivers are currently forced to use the ‘lift and coast’ technique even during their fast lap – the very moment when the cars and drivers are at their most potent. 

The aim is to assess measures that will allow a return to flat-out flying laps without the need for any management. Teams and drivers will be involved in addressing the issue, with the latter being called upon to make a significant contribution. The ball will then be in the FIA’s court, which will be tasked with devising solutions to be brought back to the negotiating table.

Therefore nothing will change ahead of the Suzuka weekend. The break in the calendar, caused by the cancellation of the Bahrain and Saudi Arabian Grands Prix, will provide the necessary time to assess any adjustments without urgency, given that F1 will return to the track in Miami on the first weekend of May. 

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Formula 1 via Getty Images

According to reports, these will not be radical changes, but targeted measures to eliminate or mitigate issues identified during the first three race weekends of the season.

There is therefore no crisis. The results from Melbourne and Shanghai have gone a long way towards allaying the concerns that had been expressed in the run-up to the season, and everyone present at today’s meeting agreed that there is no need for urgent measures. 

Several critical issues that emerged during pre-season testing in Bahrain have since been resolved or mitigated over the course of the first month of the season, up to the Chinese Grand Prix, without the need for corrective action by the International Federation.

See also:

We want your opinion!

What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?

Take our 5 minute survey.

- The Motorsport.com Team

Read and post comments

Read also :

Share Or Save This Story

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Previous article Every Aston Martin F1 team boss before outgoing Adrian Newey

Next article James Vowles admits overweight Williams needs April break to recover

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

View More & Comment

More from

Roberto Chinchero



Ferrari’s Vigna on Vasseur and fake news: “There is only one reality”

Formula 1

Formula 1

Bahrain GP in Malaysia

Ferrari’s Vigna on Vasseur and fake news: “There is only one reality”



First details of future F1 engine rules revealed

Formula 1

Formula 1

Azerbaijan GP

First details of future F1 engine rules revealed



Sainz interview: “I always believed in McLaren… but then Ferrari called”

Formula 1

Sainz interview: “I always believed in McLaren… but then Ferrari called”

Latest news



Ricky Stenhouse explains his side of Michael McDowell conflict

NASCAR Cup

NAS NASCAR Cup

Charlotte II

2 h

Ricky Stenhouse explains his side of Michael McDowell conflict



Barnes: Why IndyCar’s updated licensing system fails its own integrity test

IndyCar

Indy IndyCar 3 h

Barnes: Why IndyCar’s updated licensing system fails its own integrity test



Why NASCAR is not penalizing Stenhouse, McDowell for post-race theatrics

NASCAR Cup

NAS NASCAR Cup

Charlotte II

4 h

Why NASCAR is not penalizing Stenhouse, McDowell for post-race theatrics



Dale Jr. explains why he doesn't use 'Earnhardt' in his signature

NASCAR Cup

NAS NASCAR Cup 6 h

Dale Jr. explains why he doesn't use 'Earnhardt' in his signature

Feature

Discover prime content



Christian Horner's inside story of how Red Bull built its own F1 engine

Formula 1

By Jake Boxall-Legge

Christian Horner's inside story of how Red Bull built its own F1 engine



Exclusive video: Christian Horner interview on his Red Bull exit, Mercedes rivalry and more

Formula 1

By Autosport

Exclusive video: Christian Horner interview on his Red Bull exit, Mercedes rivalry and more



Why Mercedes' latest 2026 F1 update is no downgrade

Formula 1

Singapore GP

By Jake Boxall-Legge

Why Mercedes' latest 2026 F1 update is no downgrade



'Senior moment' or breakdown of trust? The implications of Hamilton's Singapore GP meltdown

Formula 1

Singapore GP

By Stuart Codling

'Senior moment' or breakdown of trust? The implications of Hamilton's Singapore GP meltdown

Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.

From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.

You have 2 options:

Subscribe now Already subscribed? Sign in here

Already disabled your adblocker?
Reload page

Manage Alerts

Subscribe