Breaking news

Formula 1

F1 teams back active suspension return

The majority of Formula 1 teams agree the return of active ride would be the simplest way to clarify confusion surrounding the legality of suspension systems, Motorsport.com has learned.

Lawrence Barretto

Edited: Feb 17, 2017, 12:18 PM

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Add as a preferred source

Nigel Mansell and Christian Fittipaldi

The reintroduction of active suspension is one of four approaches under evaluation for 2018, with the FIA understood to be considering clarifying the existing regulations ahead of the first pre-season test at Barcelona that starts on February 27 in the interim.

Debate about pre-loaded suspension systems has dragged on for several weeks, after Ferrari asked the FIA for clarity regarding the devices helping aerodynamic performance.

As a result, four options, one of which is the reintroduction of active suspension for the first time since it was outlawed ahead of the 1994 season, are being considered based on a document drawn up by McLaren.

Given the scale of the change, if agreed upon by the teams and the FIA, such a regulation change wouldn't come into force until 2018 at the earliest.

The active suspension proposal suggested the standardisation of the actuators would prevent a costly technical arms race.

The proposal also argues active suspension would "bring F1 into the 21st century" technologically.

Should this route be pursued, an active suspension proposal submitted by Mercedes in 2014 has been suggested as a good starting point for defining a four-channel system that would allow teams to control heave and roll electronically.

A second option suggests tightening up the suspension regulations to prevent passive systems designed to influence the aerodynamic platform.

This is based on a Ferrari proposal to interpret the original decision banning active suspension more strictly and would require a change to the wording of Article 3.14 of the technical regulations, which governs aerodynamic influence.

The third option involves exempting suspension systems from the technical regulations governing aerodynamic influence.

This would effectively allow passive systems designed to control the aerodynamic platform, although the regulations would stop short of allowing designs such as FRIC (front-to-rear interconnected) suspension to return.

While it would eliminate question marks over the legality of certain systems, there are concerns this would prove expensive.

The final option is to retain the existing regulations, but with the FIA carrying out more checks to ensure compliance and teams being required to submit documentation explaining their suspension designs.

The four options will form the basis of an ongoing discussion, which will shape the interpretation of the regulations this year and wider changes potentially made for 2018.

We want your opinion!

What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?

Take our 5 minute survey.

- The Motorsport.com Team

Read and post comments

Read also :

Share Or Save This Story

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Previous article Canadian International AutoShow celebrates 50 years of Formula 1 in Canada

Next article Canadian F1 Grand Prix announces the return of the Trios

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

View More & Comment

More from

Lawrence Barretto



Sirotkin, Stroll to have two race engineers each

Formula 1

Formula 1

Sirotkin, Stroll to have two race engineers each



Hamilton "sacrifice" saved Mercedes an hour of testing

Formula 1

Formula 1

Hamilton "sacrifice" saved Mercedes an hour of testing



Kubica regrets being "too honest" about driving limitations

Formula 1

Formula 1

Kubica regrets being "too honest" about driving limitations

Latest news



George Russell confused by lack of pace at F1 US GP despite upgraded W17

Formula 1

F1 Formula 1

United States GP

3 min

George Russell confused by lack of pace at F1 US GP despite upgraded W17



Complete NASCAR Cup points standings after 2026 Talladega II

NASCAR Cup

NAS NASCAR Cup

Talladega II

42 min

Complete NASCAR Cup points standings after 2026 Talladega II



Official race results: NASCAR Cup Talladega Chase race

NASCAR Cup

NAS NASCAR Cup

Talladega II

1 h

Official race results: NASCAR Cup Talladega Chase race



How will Kimi Antonelli become F1 world champion at Mexico GP?

Formula 1

F1 Formula 1

United States GP

1 h

How will Kimi Antonelli become F1 world champion at Mexico GP?

Feature

Discover prime content



How Verstappen and Antonelli were both “surprised” in United States GP qualifying

Formula 1

United States GP

By Stuart Codling

How Verstappen and Antonelli were both “surprised” in United States GP qualifying



What we learned from Friday practice at the 2026 United States GP

Formula 1

United States GP

By Jake Boxall-Legge

What we learned from Friday practice at the 2026 United States GP



Max Verstappen’s words explained: Why Red Bull’s turnaround is so different this time

Formula 1

United States GP

By Ronald Vording

Max Verstappen’s words explained: Why Red Bull’s turnaround is so different this time



Mission control: Inside the FIA and F1's latest answer to football's VAR

Formula 1

United States GP

By Jake Boxall-Legge

Mission control: Inside the FIA and F1's latest answer to football's VAR

Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.

From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.

You have 2 options:

Subscribe now Already subscribed? Sign in here

Already disabled your adblocker?
Reload page

Manage Alerts

Subscribe