Breaking news
Formula 1
Fernley slams "unfair" F1 Strategy Group after CFD plan veto
Force India's deputy team principal Bob Fernley has again branded the F1 Strategy Group "not fit for purpose" after it rejected the Silverstone team's CFD proposal at its last meeting.
Adam Cooper
Edited: Dec 15, 2016, 11:42 AM
Copy link
Share on Viber
The Force India proposal was intended to allow teams to focus more on CFD (Computational fluid dynamics) if they so wished.
Aerodynamic research in F1 is closely monitored by the FIA, with a carefully structured balance between wind tunnel hours and CFD teraflops.
Force India had proposed a parallel programme designed for teams who wanted to increasingly favour CFD in the future, given that the technology is becoming ever more advanced, with less emphasis on tunnel time.
However, the proposal was rejected by the Strategy Group with Ferrari, Mercedes, Red Bull, McLaren and Williams all voting against it, and only Force India itself offering support.
Fernley sees the outcome is another example of how the current governance structure is heavily weighted towards the big teams, as they can veto ideas.
"I think it shows the flaws in the strategy group," Fernley told Motorsport.com. "A programme that has been proposed to benefit F1 as a whole, and progress technology in F1 so that we become a leading exponent of the that technology, has been rejected purely on self-interest.
"And that self-interest just shows how bad the concept of the Strategy Group is. It just confirms what I've always said, it's not fit for purpose. We're on it, but all it does is allow us to witness how unfair it is.
"It was a very detailed proposal, and we believe it had merit. The concept was to be able to progress to CFD, if you wanted to do it, and it was open for everybody to be able to do that.
"The only reason the teams have voted against that is to protect the advantage that they have today. It's just a refusal to allow things to progress."
An opportunity missed
Fernley is adamant that what Force India proposed would have been good for the sport, and ultimately saved teams money.
"We know that CFD technology today doesn't give you quite the results that you can get in the wind tunnel, but if you want to progress CFD to the point where it's going to do that, then you have to unleash it a little bit more.
"For those teams who want to take the risk to do that, particularly the ones that don't have their own wind tunnels, this was an avenue that they could go down.
"What we were trying to do with the proposal was give F1 the opportunity to move forward with simulation technology, which is a) going to be a lot more cost effective and b) is more relevant to the future than wind tunnels, which in time will be obsolete. All we've done is delay that process.
"You've got to remember that the manufacturer teams have the finances to be able to update their wind tunnels, they've spent millions improving the efficiency of them, so they can then use that efficiency to gain more CFD time under the current formula.
"And by doing that, they've got an advantage."
Also rejected at the last Strategy Group meeting was a proposal from Manor to give more wind tunnel time to teams using cheaper and less accurate 50 percent scale tunnels rather than 60 percent, which has become the norm.
Only Force India supported the idea.
"What they were saying was if you're operating on a 50 percent tunnel, you've got a disadvantage in terms of fidelity, so could you have 10 percent more running time? I thought that was a fair and reasonable proposal, and that would help teams like Manor to be able to progress.
"A team like Manor has no voice. They can put things to the Strategy Group, five teams vote against it, and really for no reason whatsoever, other than protecting their own interests. We want to get the sport competitive.
"There are times when you've got to allow a little bit of flexibility, and I don't think it was an unreasonable proposal."
We want your opinion!
What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?
Take our 5 minute survey.
- The Motorsport.com Team
Read and post comments
Read also :
Share Or Save This Story
Copy link
Share on Viber
Previous article F1 engine formula needs road relevance rethink - Brawn
Next article F1 2016 review: Haas hits the ground running
Top Comments
There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?
View More & Comment
More from
Adam Cooper
RB: Tsunoda “mentally on a different level” in 2024
Formula 1
Formula 1
Japanese GP
RB: Tsunoda “mentally on a different level” in 2024
Andretti planning F2 and F3 entries to promote US talent to F1 team
Formula 1
Formula 1
Andretti planning F2 and F3 entries to promote US talent to F1 team
Andretti F1 team formally opens new Silverstone facility
Formula 1
Formula 1
Andretti F1 team formally opens new Silverstone facility
More from
Force India
Otmar Szafnauer reveals failed Kimi Raikkonen bid involving "Angry Birds" founders
Formula 1
Formula 1
Canadian GP
Otmar Szafnauer reveals failed Kimi Raikkonen bid involving "Angry Birds" founders
Esteban Ocon explains why he collided with Sergio Perez so often at Force India
Formula 1
Formula 1
Esteban Ocon explains why he collided with Sergio Perez so often at Force India
Former Force India F1 boss Fernley dies aged 70
Formula 1
Formula 1
Austrian GP
Former Force India F1 boss Fernley dies aged 70
Latest news
Ryan Blaney kind of faces a must-win scenario this weekend at Phoenix
NASCAR Cup
NAS NASCAR Cup
Phoenix II
20 min
Ryan Blaney kind of faces a must-win scenario this weekend at Phoenix
Catching Larson in the NASCAR Chase has to start at track where 'I suck'
NASCAR Cup
NAS NASCAR Cup
Phoenix II
1 h
Catching Larson in the NASCAR Chase has to start at track where 'I suck'
Verstappen charges from 24th to ninth as GetSpeed wins Portimao GTWC finale
GT World Challenge Europe Endurance
WCEE GT World Challenge Europe Endurance 2 h
Verstappen charges from 24th to ninth as GetSpeed wins Portimao GTWC finale
Colton Herta “maybe underestimated the difference” from IndyCar – F2 boss
FIA F2
F2 FIA F2 6 h
Colton Herta “maybe underestimated the difference” from IndyCar – F2 boss
Feature
Discover prime content
Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
You have 2 options:
- Become a subscriber.
- Disable your adblocker.
Subscribe now Already subscribed? Sign in here
Already disabled your adblocker?
Reload page
Manage Alerts
Subscribe