Ferrari doubts there was fuel discrepancy in Abu Dhabi

Ferrari has doubts there was an actual discrepancy between the amount of fuel that was in Charles Leclerc's car for the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix and what it had declared before the race, Motorsport.com understands.

Ferrari doubts there was fuel discrepancy in Abu Dhabi

The Italian outfit was fined 50,000 Euros in Abu Dhabi after FIA checks found there was 4.88kg more fuel in the car than had been declared by the team.

But despite having checked its figures again this week in light of the affair, Ferrari remains at a loss to explain why the FIA's fuel weight figure is so far out from its own calculation of what was in the car.

The procedure regarding the amount of fuel in the car is covered under a technical directive - TD12-19 - which was issued before the start of the season.

Teams have to declare the amount of fuel they intend to put in the car – which covers the laps to the grid, the formation lap, the race and the in-lap – at least two hours before the pit lane opens.

The FIA can then conduct random checks before the pit lane opens to check this declaration matches what is in the tank.

It was during one of these checks on Leclerc's Ferrari that the FIA discovered a difference between what Ferrari had declared and the amount of fuel it believed was in the car.

But it was not until 16.22 - eight minutes before the pitlane opened for the start of the race - that Ferrari was notified the FIA had found this discrepancy.

Read Also:

By that stage it was too late to request a second check on the amount of fuel and, once Leclerc had left the garage, there was then no way of proving what may or may not have been in the car.

As a result of the FIA finding the discrepancy, Ferrari was summoned to a post-race hearing where the team was given a 50,000 Euro fine for a breach of the International Sporting Code.

It ruled that Ferrari broke Article 12.1.1.i of the ISC which states that there was a 'failure to follow the instructions of the relevant officials for the safe and orderly conduct of the Event.'

The stewards were clear, however, that there had been no technical rules breach - so there is no suggestion that Ferrari may have burned more than the 110kg that is allowed for the duration of the race.

Ferrari is understood to still be unsure about why there was a discrepancy, because its calculations of the fuel in Leclerc's car match remain in line with the declaration it made before the race.

It does not believe it made an error with its declaration, and it remains convinced that the amount of fuel in the car matches that figure.

Indeed, it is understood that a post race check of the fuel remaining in the car and how much had been used in the race tallied with Ferrari's original declaration.

Furthermore it is well used to the fuel check procedures, with Ferrari team principal Mattia Binotto making it clear after the race that the team had been checked at almost every other race this season.

"It is not the first time we are doing it," he said. "This season we have been checked at least 10 times. It's not the first time and it has always been OK and today we've got a discrepancy on which we don't know the [reason]."

Read Also:

Having conducted and passed the tests regularly during the year, it is hard to believe that amid the focus on engine and fuel rules in the closing stages of the season that Ferrari would have risked doing anything in breach of the regulations in the final race of the campaign.

According to FIA documents, a number of other fuel checks were carried out on all cars afterwards too.

These covered fuel meter calibration checksums, instantaneous fuel mass flow, fuel temperature and total fuel mass consumed by all cars.

The FIA confirmed that all cars were in conformity of the regulations.

Ferrari's doubt about the discrepancy means there can only really be two options to explain what happened.

Either Ferrari somehow put more fuel in the car than it believes (something it is adamant it did not and has found no evidence for), or the FIA's own measurements during its checks were incorrect.

With it impossible now to redo the fuel checks, the real explanation for what happened will likely remain a mystery.

shares
comments
 The signs that suggest Vettel isn't about to retire

Previous article

The signs that suggest Vettel isn't about to retire

Next article

Wolff "cannot imagine" a better place than Mercedes

Wolff "cannot imagine" a better place than Mercedes
Load comments
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog Prime

The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog

A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says Stuart Codling.

Formula 1
Sep 18, 2021
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from Prime

The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from

OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix clash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences.

Formula 1
Sep 17, 2021
How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum Prime

How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum

With two sprint races under its belt, Formula 1 must now consider its options for them going forward. While they've helped deliver exciting racing on Sundays, the sprints themselves have been somewhat lacking - creating yet another conundrum for F1 to solve...

Formula 1
Sep 16, 2021
Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season? Prime

Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season?

OPINION: With Valtteri Bottas already signed up for 2022, all eyes are on the race for the second seat at Alfa Romeo next year. Antonio Giovinazzi is the current incumbent, but faces a tough competition from appealing short and long-term prospects

Formula 1
Sep 15, 2021
The "forced break" that was key to Ricciardo's Monza excellence Prime

The "forced break" that was key to Ricciardo's Monza excellence

OPINION: Daniel Ricciardo has long been considered one of Formula 1's elite drivers. But his struggles at McLaren since switching from Renault for 2021 have been painful to watch at times. Yet he's recovered to banish those memories with a famous Monza win – built on a critically important foundation

Formula 1
Sep 14, 2021
Italian Grand Prix driver ratings Prime

Italian Grand Prix driver ratings

Two drivers produced faultless performances as, for the second year in a row, Monza threw up an unpredictable result that left many to rue what might have been

Formula 1
Sep 13, 2021
Why Ricciardo would have won without Verstappen/Hamilton crash Prime

Why Ricciardo would have won without Verstappen/Hamilton crash

The clash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton was the major flashpoint the 2021 Italian Grand Prix will be remembered for. Yet by this point, race leader Daniel Ricciardo had already done the hard work that would put him in position to end his and McLaren's lengthy win droughts, on a memorable afternoon in Monza

Formula 1
Sep 13, 2021
Why Italian GP success is on for McLaren even if Verstappen dominates Prime

Why Italian GP success is on for McLaren even if Verstappen dominates

For the second time in 2021, McLaren will line up for the start of a grand prix from the first row. It knows it has the chance of "glory" if things go well for Daniel Ricciardo and Lando Norris at the start of the 2021 Italian Grand Prix, but even if they just maintain their grid positions, signs from the rest of the Monza weekend suggest success is very possible for Formula 1's other orange army

Formula 1
Sep 12, 2021