Formula 1
FIA issues clarification to F1 drivers over political statement clampdown
The FIA has clarified its clampdown on political and personal statements to Formula 1 drivers, making clear what will and will not be tolerated at grand prix events.
Alex Kalinauckas
Edited: Feb 18, 2023, 12:00 PM
Copy link
Share on Viber
In a document distributed to the teams on Friday, titled, 'Guidance on the Principle of Neutrality (Article 12.2.1.n of the ISC)' the governing body explained how an update to its long-standing International Sporting Code published late in 2022 will work in practice regarding drivers making personal statements on various issues and topics.
In the document, a copy of which has been seen by Motorsport.com, the FIA insists drivers are free to express their own beliefs, but only at specific times and in certain circumstances, which generally cover the time of sporting competition (on-track action, the podium and drivers' parade).
But it reiterates they must still seek permission to discuss certain topics.
The FIA says the drivers are free to "express their views on any political, religious or personal matter before, during and after the International Competition, in their own space, and outside the scope of the International Competition", such as on social media and during media interviews, including the FIA press conferences.
But the clarification of Article 12.2.1.n goes on to state that in addition to not making particular statements during the drivers' parade, national anthem ceremonies, pre- and post-season driver group photographs and podium (so including visual gestures, such as wearing a certain item of clothing) "participants are not permitted to make political, religious and/or personal statements in violation of the general principle of neutrality during [the] FIA press conferences (except in response to direct questions from accredited journalists)."
The FIA has also issued guidance on what constitutes "political", "religious" or "personal" expressions, as concerning Article 12.2.1.n.
This states a rule breach will have been considered to have occurred if: "The general making and display of political, religious and personal statements or comments notably in violation of the general principle of neutrality promoted by the FIA under its Statutes, unless previously approved in writing by the FIA for International Competitions, or by the relevant ASN for National Competitions within their jurisdiction".
F1 races stewards will determine if a rule breach has occurred on a case-by-case basis.
The FIA clarification states that an example of a political statement breaching the rules would be a driver not asking permission to discuss "if they make any unapproved statements or comments" regarding "Any local, regional, or national government or any of its departments, offices or functions".
Sebastian Vettel, Aston Martin
Photo by: Carl Bingham / Motorsport Images
The governing body states that an example of a rules breach regarding unapproved statements concerning religions would be "anything critical of or hostile to others' religious or spiritual beliefs".
It has clarified that "private, non-proselytising religious gestures, such as pointing to the sky or crossing oneself, shall not be considered prohibited religious statements."
The 'personal' example where permission must be sought by a driver means "any circumstance personal to the participant.
Competitors must not use events as a platform to share personal statements of any kind in violation of the general principle of neutrality", which concerns Article 2 of the FIA Statutes (in effect since 8 May 1970) and is – per the FIA – the principal concern of the efforts made to clarify what drivers can and cannot say at F1 events.
The FIA's guidance states that drivers seeking permission to make a statement that would otherwise contravene Article 12.2.1.n must do so "at least four weeks before the event concerned" and says "Late requests will only be considered by the FIA on an exceptional basis", with any permissions granted covering just one F1 event.
Motorsport.com understands that a grey area exists regarding driver helmets – naturally very visible during on-track action and can be compared to the various European nations that wished the captains of their men's football teams to wear a rainbow 'OneLove' armband in the recent World Cup in Qatar.
This was stopped by FIFA, which said sporing sanctions such as a yellow card would be issued if this went ahead.
Motorsport.com has asked if, for example, Lewis Hamilton wished to again wear a rainbow livery helmet in the returning Qatar Grand Prix in 2023 and it is understood that he would be advised to seek permission to do so or risk being in breach of Article 12.2.1.n if he did not.
Read Also:
- Russell: F1 driver statement clampdown “a silly regulation”
- Norris: FIA clampdown will make F1 drivers feel like they're in school
Regarding the guidance being issued to the teams, an FIA spokesperson said: "A Guidance Note has been issued to Participants in International Competitions that sets out the scope of the updates made to the FIA International Sporting Code in December.
"The updates cement the FIA's longstanding commitment to protecting motor sport's neutrality, and will particularly ensure neutrality during key moments across all motorsport competitions, such as podiums, national anthems and official activities 'on the field of play' – it does not impose any additional restrictions on individuals expressing their views outside of these times.
"The Guidance Note does not alter Article 12.2.1.n of the FIA International Sporting Code.
"It was necessary to provide a separate guidance document to facilitate the implementation of the principles of neutrality across the many different motorsport disciplines."
We want your opinion!
What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?
Take our 5 minute survey.
- The Motorsport.com Team
Read and post comments
Read also :
Share Or Save This Story
Copy link
Share on Viber
Previous article How "demanding" Alonso has started life with Aston Martin F1
Next article In full: The FIA's clarification on F1's political statement clampdown
Top Comments
There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?
View More & Comment
More from
Alex Kalinauckas
Who is Kimi Antonelli, F1 sprint polesitter at just 18?
Formula 1
Formula 1
Who is Kimi Antonelli, F1 sprint polesitter at just 18?
Why Bottas has the edge over Perez in 2026 F1 return race
Formula 1
Formula 1
Japanese GP
Why Bottas has the edge over Perez in 2026 F1 return race
What if Red Bull solved its second-car problem with a paint job?
Formula 1
Formula 1
Japanese GP
What if Red Bull solved its second-car problem with a paint job?
Latest news
Mirko Bortolotti risked another disqualification: How Grasser saved second place
DTM
DTM DTM 6 min
Mirko Bortolotti risked another disqualification: How Grasser saved second place
FIA enforces new rule to close F1 cost cap loophole
Formula 1
F1 Formula 1
United States GP
1 h
FIA enforces new rule to close F1 cost cap loophole
Marc Marquez praises MotoGP title rival Jorge Martín: “He is an incredible talent”
MotoGP
MGP MotoGP 1 h
Marc Marquez praises MotoGP title rival Jorge Martín: “He is an incredible talent”
McLaren held fresh talks after Singapore GP clash as Lando Norris promises to "make better decisions"
Formula 1
F1 Formula 1
United States GP
2 h
McLaren held fresh talks after Singapore GP clash as Lando Norris promises to "make better decisions"
Feature
Discover prime content
Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
You have 2 options:
- Become a subscriber.
- Disable your adblocker.
Subscribe now Already subscribed? Sign in here
Already disabled your adblocker?
Reload page
Manage Alerts
Subscribe