Skip to main content

Recommended for you

Max Verstappen’s GT3 rise praised by F1 safety car driver Bernd Maylander

Formula 1
Bahrain GP
Max Verstappen’s GT3 rise praised by F1 safety car driver Bernd Maylander

Cadillac F1 announces free Miami fan experience for 2026 grand prix weekend

Formula 1
Miami GP
Cadillac F1 announces free Miami fan experience for 2026 grand prix weekend

How to watch NASCAR at Kansas: Weekend schedule, start time, TV

NASCAR Cup
Kansas
How to watch NASCAR at Kansas: Weekend schedule, start time, TV

Kevin Harvick says Alex Bowman needs to win to keep Hendrick job

NASCAR Cup
Kevin Harvick says Alex Bowman needs to win to keep Hendrick job

What caused Marco Sorensen’s heavy WEC Prologue crash for Aston Martin?

WEC
Imola Prologue
What caused Marco Sorensen’s heavy WEC Prologue crash for Aston Martin?

Oliver Bearman blames Franco Colapinto for F1 Japanese GP crash

Formula 1
Japanese GP
Oliver Bearman blames Franco Colapinto for F1 Japanese GP crash

Niels Wittich: Michael Masi a “scapegoat” who “didn’t do much wrong” at Abu Dhabi 2021

Formula 1
Abu Dhabi GP
Niels Wittich: Michael Masi a “scapegoat” who “didn’t do much wrong” at Abu Dhabi 2021

Mick Schumacher says F1 "will find a solution" to improve 2026 regulations

Formula 1
Mick Schumacher says F1 "will find a solution" to improve 2026 regulations

FIA president Ben Sulayem at centre of further allegations over Las Vegas homologation

Further allegations have been made against FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem, this time claiming he pushed for officials not to certify the Las Vegas Formula 1 circuit, the BBC reports.

Mohammed ben Sulayem, President EMSO (UAE)

According to the BBC story, a whistleblower claims that they were told “on behest of the FIA president” to not homologate the street track ahead of last November’s inaugural Las Vegas Grand Prix - a flagship event for F1 as it moved to promote the race itself for the first time.

This claim is included in a report, which the BBC claims to have seen, by the FIA’s compliance officer to its ethics committee.

There was a delay before the circuit was ready for inspection due to “ongoing local organiser construction works”. Thereafter, the whistleblower says they were contracted by their manager with the instruction from Ben Sulayem to find issues with the venue so it could not be declared safe. But no concerns were found.

This accusation appears to sit at odds with Ben Sulayem’s claims that he supported the homologation of the new track and that the relationship between the governing body and FOM is much stronger than when he first replaced predecessor Jean Todt.

In an exclusive interview with Motorsport.com's sister title GP Racing magazine, Ben Sulayem was asked whether the FIA and FOM must always agree. His reply was: “No. FOM has its points. But today, since I took over the presidency, we’re in a much better position together.

General view of the start finish line from above at the Las Vegas GP

General view of the start finish line from above at the Las Vegas GP

Photo by: Philip Hurst / Motorsport Images

“And if you told me that I could go back and change some of the things that happened, for example, when I got hit by the media – I wouldn’t change anything.

“Let me give you an example from Las Vegas... The president of the FIA is the one who signs the homologation for the new track, or for all the tracks. I supported it.

“I could have said no, [because it wasn’t ready in time for inspection]. But as soon as my team said it was safe... because I’m a driver, I care about the wellbeing of the drivers and the people around them, our staff and the marshals. I did it.

“It was a big thing. If I had said no, it would have been disastrous [for F1]. But it would have been legal. But I’m careful because I love the sport.

“At the end of the day, we’re in the same boat. We may have different missions. But we’re in the same boat. We cannot let the sport sink.”

Ben Sulayem has also been accused by the same whistleblower of attempting to get the race stewards to overturn a penalty that initially cost Fernando Alonso third place in the 2023 Saudi Arabian GP.

After an approach for comment by Motorsport.com, the FIA said: "The FIA confirms that the Compliance Officer has received a report detailing potential allegations involving certain members of its governing bodies.

"The Compliance Department is assessing these concerns, as is common practice in these matters, to ensure that due process is meticulously followed."

Read Also:
Previous article What Verstappen's outlook on racing in F1 says about his next move
Next article F1 Saudi Arabian GP: How to watch, ESPN Formula 1 TV times

Top Comments

Latest news