Formula 1
Formula 1
02 Jul
-
05 Jul
Event finished
09 Jul
-
12 Jul
FP1 in
03 Hours
:
17 Minutes
:
08 Seconds
16 Jul
-
19 Jul
FP1 in
7 days
31 Jul
-
02 Aug
FP1 in
21 days
R
70th Anniversary GP
06 Aug
-
09 Aug
FP1 in
28 days
R
Spanish GP
13 Aug
-
16 Aug
FP1 in
35 days
R
Italian GP
03 Sep
-
06 Sep
FP1 in
56 days
24 Sep
-
27 Sep
FP1 in
77 days
29 Oct
-
01 Nov
FP1 in
112 days
R
Brazilian GP
12 Nov
-
15 Nov
FP1 in
126 days
R
Abu Dhabi GP
26 Nov
-
29 Nov
FP1 in
140 days

FIA explains why Verstappen decision took so long

shares
comments
FIA explains why Verstappen decision took so long
By:
Jun 30, 2019, 7:37 PM

The long wait to learn whether Max Verstappen had kept his Austrian Grand Prix victory was a result of various influencing factors, says FIA Formula 1 race director Michael Masi.

Verstappen beat Charles Leclerc to win the race at the Red Bull Ring but his race-winning move was placed under investigation as the two drivers made contact and Leclerc briefly went off-track.

The decision to take no further action was communicated at 7.47pm local time, more than three hours after the race ended.

Asked by Motorsport.com to explain why the decision took so long, Masi said that it started with the incident occurring with three laps to go, giving little time to act before the end of the race.

“The primary part was we didn’t get going [with the stewards’ hearing] until 6pm, [because of] the various media commitments, the [television] pen and the post-race press conference,” said Masi. “The hearing itself, give or take, was about an hour with all parties involved.

“The stewards deliberated, looked at other cases, precedents, and spoke between themselves.

“By the time you write the decision and then make sure there are no typos or anything in it and so forth, and then summon the teams back, delivering the decision to them, it quickly [adds up].

“Time flies a lot more when you’re sitting outside like all of us than it does when you’re sitting in the room. So it was just one of those things, they were considering absolutely everything.”

More from the Austrian GP:

The decision followed two controversial calls at the previous two races in France and Canada.

In France, Daniel Ricciardo was given a time penalty that dropped him out of the points almost three hours after the race ended.

The decision to punish Sebastian Vettel in Canada was made during the race and therefore even though Vettel crossed the line first, Lewis Hamilton inherited the win immediately and the result was clear.

Asked if something could be changed to prevent the winner changing beyond the race’s end, Masi admitted it was “tough” and pointed out that a problem uncovered in post-race scrutineering that results in disqualification can also change the identity of the winner.

“You want the right decision made, considering all the circumstances and all the factors that are around, and using as much as information as you have available,” he added.

Masi also suggested it was not correct to draw parallels to decision-making speeds in other sports.

“It’s just one of those nuances in this sport,” he said. “We can’t blow a whistle and freeze everything, make a decision, and play on.

“We try wherever possible to have the podium be the podium, but when it’s the last two or three laps of the race, it does make it quite difficult.

“If it was something that happened on lap three I would have thought that if the stewards felt they had everything, they would have made a decision and it would have been ‘play on’.”

Next article
Binotto: Ferrari won't appeal "wrong" Verstappen verdict

Previous article

Binotto: Ferrari won't appeal "wrong" Verstappen verdict

Next article

Austrian GP: Lap by lap animation

Austrian GP: Lap by lap animation
Load comments

About this article

Series Formula 1
Event Austrian GP
Sub-event Race
Author Scott Mitchell