Motorsport Blog
Topic

Motorsport Blog

Strategy Report: How Verstappen’s charge shook Ferrari into action

James Allen takes a strategic review of the United States Grand Prix, in which it was again Red Bull that triggered one of the big two teams into action.

Strategy Report: How Verstappen’s charge shook Ferrari into action

Red Bull has come on strongly late in the season after a slow start, as happened last year, and the team increasingly plays a role in race outcomes.

And because is not involved in the championship fight, it can try aggressive disruption strategies on the others to try to force them into doing things they don’t want to do on strategy. We saw that vividly from Max Verstappen in Austin, as he made a surprise second stop on Lap 37 to shake the tree.

Here we will analyse the strategy, and why Ferrari and Mercedes reacted as they did.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB13
Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB13

Photo by: Charles Coates / LAT Images

Pre-race considerations

Pirelli had brought the ultrasoft tyres to Austin, a good step more aggressive than previous years, where the range had included the mediums. But with the strategies having been disappointingly binary this year, rather than spread across the three compounds available, the Italian marque was trying to stimulate more variety with its selection.

It worked in Austin and all three compounds were used in the race. After the practice running, which was mostly held in dry conditions, it looked like a finely balanced decision between a one- and two-stop race.

Red Bull and Daniel Ricciardo had qualified strongly in fourth and had an aggressive armoury of tyres with two new sets of supersofts available for the race, hinting at a flat-out two-stopper. The Australian did pull that trigger on race day, but an engine failure meant we never got to see the outcome.

Mercedes had done its usual tactic and kept all options open, with one new set of supersofts in addition to new softs, while Ferrari had no new sets of supersofts for the race; they had installed a set in FP3, which was next-to-new, however.

The car of Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes-Benz F1 W08 is pushed by mechanics
The car of Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes-Benz F1 W08 is pushed to the grid by mechanics

Photo by: Sutton Images

A violent storm on race morning dumped huge amounts of water on to the track and washed away all the rubber that had been laid over the weekend, raising the spectre of two stops being a sensible plan.

The key to the race, then, would be how hot the temperatures might get during, how much degradation that would cause and whether that might tip it towards a two-stop race. It was cooler on Sunday than on Saturday, and that tipped the balance away from Ferrari, towards Mercedes and played a hand in deciding the race in Hamilton’s favour rather than Vettel’s.

Another factor in the strategy planning was the power of the Drag Reduction System (DRS) this weekend, which was worth 0.7s on the main straight. So if a car could get close enough into the turn before the straight, an overtake was certainly possible.

And we also saw it give the car behind the ability to get close and then attack in the sequence of corners that followed. This became the default for many drivers during the race and led to many overtakes in the final sector of the lap.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB13
Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB13 charges through the pack

Photo by: Sutton Images

Red Bull tries the disruption strategy

Verstappen drove a stunning race, after taking a grid penalty for replacing his engine for the new specification higher-performing Renault. He was targeting the podium from 16th on the grid and it needed something special from the strategists, as well as from the driver.

Verstappen played his part with some excellent overtakes, but the masterstroke from the strategist was to pull the Dutchman in on Lap 37 for supersoft tyres. This disrupted the battle ahead with Vettel in second place, leading Bottas and Raikkonen at that time.

Red Bull could make the stop because there was no threat from behind: Ocon was 50 seconds away, so Verstappen could use fresh supersoft tyres on a clear track to hunt down the leading cars that at that stage were already struggling on the soft tyres, with 19 laps to the finish.

Vettel and Bottas in particular both looked to be in trouble, while Raikkonen’s tyres were in good shape.

Red Bull was agitating, hoping to get Ferrari or Mercedes to cover the stop. But the reality was that once he made it, both Bottas and Raikkonen would have lost a place if they stopped on the following lap.

Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari SF70H, in the pit lane
Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari SF70H, in the pit lane

Photo by: Steven Tee / LAT Images

Only Vettel had enough margin to cover the move. He had been talking on the radio about a Plan B anyway, which was a second stop. So it was logical for him to be the only one to cover Verstappen.

As Bottas and Raikkonen were already compromised by the move, the so-called number two drivers were left out to block Verstappen’s progress. For Bottas, he was also going to be called on to block Vettel as the German came back through.

It meant that Vettel would have to fight his way back through to second place, but he managed it. Given that Verstappen only caught Raikkonen on the last lap, you could argue that Vettel’s extra stop was unnecessary, but as he had been complaining about the soft tyres anyway, it made sense.

Verstappen made up 18 seconds in 19 laps and caught Raikkonen because the Finn was fuel-saving in the closing stages. We saw that with Vettel in Malaysia, towards the end of the race, so Ferrari has had some difficulties since the new version of the engine was introduced in getting the starting fuel level right.

Mercedes had a 9-second margin with Hamilton, and with Bottas as a buffer, they did not feel the need to cover Verstappen and Vettel’s move.

Valtteri Bottas, Mercedes AMG F1 W08
Valtteri Bottas, Mercedes AMG F1 W08

Photo by: Charles Coates / LAT Images

Mercedes not perfect - Bottas misses out again

Bottas celebrated Mercedes’ fourth consecutive constructors’ championship with the rest of the team, but his dream switch to the strongest team in F1 currently has not been going smoothly as of late.

He has used the world ‘struggling’ frequently in the recent weeks and in Austin he missed out on a podium on a day when his teammate managed to dominate the race.

Bottas qualified third and held that position through the round of pitstops which put the front runners onto soft tyres and ostensibly a one-stop race. By Lap 35 it was clear that Bottas and Vettel were struggling with the tyres and considering switching to a two-stop plan. At this point Verstappen had not stopped.

The consideration they had was that had Mercedes pulled the trigger, it would have amounted to an undercut attempt on Vettel, who would have been able to cover it the next lap. So in terms of a chance to move forward it was limited in scope. But what about as a defensive play against cars behind? It was a question of whether they could hold up Raikkonen on the same tyres.

They believed they could, especially with Raikkonen in fuel-saving mode, but they were wrong. Raikkonen passed Bottas on Lap 42 and after Vettel came through on fresh tyres and with Verstappen set to pass him as well, Bottas made a late stop.

With a huge gap back to Ocon, there was nothing to lose by doing this. But by not following the initial instinct to stop, what would have been a podium ended up a fifth place and more dejection for Bottas.

Carlos Sainz Jr., Renault Sport F1 Team RS17
Carlos Sainz Jr., Renault Sport F1 Team RS17

Photo by: Sutton Images

Sainz and Ocon shine through

Carlos Sainz finished sixth in Austin in 2015, although he was later demoted to seventh for a pitlane speeding penalty. Last year he got his sixth place and this year, on his debut with Renault, so driving an unfamiliar car, he bagged seventh, behind Esteban Ocon; a fantastic result.

In this he was helped by the latest installment of the Force India driver feud, whereby Sergio Perez was again requesting to be allowed through past his teammate. He was told that Ocon was “managing his pace” to the end of the race on the soft tyres, so it was not the case that Perez was faster.

The team was unwilling to swap the cars because they felt it would not change the finishing result and points haul, as in Japan. But, unlike the last race, they were wrong because Sainz cruised up behind Perez and passed him, dropping the Mexican to eighth, where he finished. 

Felipe Massa started the race in 10th place, due to other drivers’ grid penalties, and was able to start on supersoft tyres and run a long first stint. He pitted on Lap 29 onto ultrasoft tyres, leaving 26 laps to the finish.

It was an unusual strategy, and it netted him a ninth place after he passed Kvyat at the end of the race. But he was never on the pace of Sainz and the Force India cars ahead.

The UBS Race Strategy Report is written by James Allen with input and data from several F1 team strategists and from Pirelli

Race history and tyre usage graphs

Shows the relative performance of the cars and the gaps between them. Upward curve is positive. Lap time and gaps down the vertical axis, lap number on the horizontal.

Race history

Look at Bottas’s pace (blue dotted line, above) in comparison with Hamilton. Had he stopped on Lap 35 or 36 he would not have been passed by Verstappen and would probably have been able to pass Raikkonen for third place in the closing stages to secure a podium.

Kindly provided by Williams Martini Racing

Tyre history
shares
Vandoorne column: Austin upgrades, Alonso deal a boost for 2018

Previous article

Vandoorne column: Austin upgrades, Alonso deal a boost for 2018

Next article

Verstappen: 'Idiot' remark not meant to hurt anyone

Verstappen: 'Idiot' remark not meant to hurt anyone
How Mika Hakkinen thrived at Lotus Prime

How Mika Hakkinen thrived at Lotus

Mika Hakkinen became Michael Schumacher’s biggest rival in Formula 1 in the late-90s and early 2000s, having also made his F1 debut in 1991. But as MARK GALLAGHER recalls, while Schumacher wowed the world with a car that was eminently capable, Hakkinen was fighting to make his mark with a famous team in terminal decline

The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey  Prime

The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey 

Before Michael Schumacher – or anyone else – had driven the 191 (or 911 as it was initially called), Eddie Jordan turned to a fellow Irishman to test his new Formula 1 car. JOHN WATSON, a grand prix winner for Penske and McLaren, recalls his role in the birth of a legend…

Formula 1
Sep 20, 2021
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog Prime

The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog

A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says Stuart Codling.

Formula 1
Sep 18, 2021
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from Prime

The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from

OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix clash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences.

Formula 1
Sep 17, 2021
How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum Prime

How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum

With two sprint races under its belt, Formula 1 must now consider its options for them going forward. While they've helped deliver exciting racing on Sundays, the sprints themselves have been somewhat lacking - creating yet another conundrum for F1 to solve...

Formula 1
Sep 16, 2021
Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season? Prime

Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season?

OPINION: With Valtteri Bottas already signed up for 2022, all eyes are on the race for the second seat at Alfa Romeo next year. Antonio Giovinazzi is the current incumbent, but faces a tough competition from appealing short and long-term prospects

Formula 1
Sep 15, 2021
The "forced break" that was key to Ricciardo's Monza excellence Prime

The "forced break" that was key to Ricciardo's Monza excellence

OPINION: Daniel Ricciardo has long been considered one of Formula 1's elite drivers. But his struggles at McLaren since switching from Renault for 2021 have been painful to watch at times. Yet he's recovered to banish those memories with a famous Monza win – built on a critically important foundation

Formula 1
Sep 14, 2021
Italian Grand Prix driver ratings Prime

Italian Grand Prix driver ratings

Two drivers produced faultless performances as, for the second year in a row, Monza threw up an unpredictable result that left many to rue what might have been

Formula 1
Sep 13, 2021