Opinion: Why F1 needs the jeopardy of human error to spice up races

In the pursuit of engineering perfection, it is the man-made mistakes like Red Bull’s in Monaco that continue to ramp up the drama in Formula 1, says Kate Walker.

Opinion: Why F1 needs the jeopardy of human error to spice up races
During 70 laps, they all tried to push Gilles Villeneuve at fault and pass him; they never could and Gilles went on to win his 6th and last Grand Prix
Mark Webber, Red Bull Racing stops after a engine blow and fire
Kimi Raikkonen crashes in the last lap
Ralf Schumacher's engine blows up
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB12
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB12 pits late in the race with a puncture
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing congratulates Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing after his first F1 win
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB12
Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing climbs out of his car in parc ferme
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing
Start action: Nico Rosberg, Mercedes AMG F1 Team W07, Valtteri Bottas, Williams FW38 and Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 Team W07

One of the charges levelled against Formula 1 recently has been that the sport has reached a point where the pursuit of mechanical perfection has created an anodyne arena of predictability, and is bereft of the drama of the good old days.

Long gone, people say, are the times when a last-lap engine failure would leave the race leader out for the count, or a mistimed gear change would hand the on-track advantage to a rival. Or so the story goes…

In fact, one of the factors in the close racing enjoyed by F1 fans in 2016 has been the reintroduction of simple human error. The outcomes of the grands prix in both Monaco and Spain were influenced by teams simply getting it wrong, as Red Bull’s Daniel Ricciardo found out the hard way.

At the Circuit de Catalunya last month, Ricciardo was in with great chance of the race win, but the Australian driver lost out when the Red Bull pit wall elected to keep him on a three-stop strategy that proved not to be as quick as had been predicted.

The added value of fresh rubber in the final stint was negated by the loss of track position, and it was teammate Max Verstappen, on a two-stop, who claimed victory for Red Bull.

Two weeks later, at the Monaco Grand Prix, Ricciardo again lost out at the chance of victory thanks to another round of pitstop problems. Having planned to send their driver out on softs for his final stint, Red Bull decided to switch to the supersofts at the last moment, when they saw Lewis Hamilton had switched to the ultrasoft compound.

But it transpired that the tyres weren’t accessible in time, and the seconds Ricciardo lost sitting in his pitbox while the team rummaged were enough to cost him a second likely win in two weeks.

Extra variables have helped shake it up

Strategic bungles are part and parcel of F1, always have been, but the 2016 introduction of additional tyre compounds – and drivers’ individual rubber selections – has boosted the strategic options on offer, and as a consequence increased the possibility of simply getting it wrong relative to the competition.

Another factor has been the changes to both start procedures and team-car radio communications, both of which have made it easier for human error to creep in and keep things interesting.

So far, the 2016 F1 season has been a triumph of errors both human and mechanical. Hamilton’s predicted walkover title defense has been on the back foot since Melbourne, when a poor start from pole saw teammate Nico Rosberg claim victory.

A first-lap clash with the Wiliams of Valtteri Bottas cost the Briton another possible win in Bahrain, while power unit problems in qualifying in both China and Russia further contributed to a championship battle far tenser than any would have predicted in the pre-season.

Speaking in 2009, then-Ferrari team principal Stefano Domenicali reflected on human error in F1: “The procedural reliability is part of the overall reliability,” he said. “Human errors remain a characteristic of the team and the drivers, which gives a certain humanity to racing.

“We have tried to improve the procedures and we have introduced people from different areas to improve the procedures and increase concentration – but human error will always play a part.”

shares
comments
Honda to run new turbo in Canada

Previous article

Honda to run new turbo in Canada

Next article

Former Red Bull junior Chandhok defends Marko's approach

Former Red Bull junior Chandhok defends Marko's approach
Load comments
Why the end is nigh for F1’s most dependable design tool Prime

Why the end is nigh for F1’s most dependable design tool

Wind tunnel work forms the bedrock of aerodynamic development in Formula 1. But as Pat Symonds explains, advances in virtual research are signalling the end of these expensive and complicated relics.

Why Mosley’s legacy amounts to far more than tabloid rumour Prime

Why Mosley’s legacy amounts to far more than tabloid rumour

The newspapers, naturally, lingered over Max Mosley’s tainted family history and niche sexual practices. But this is to trivialise the legacy of a big beast of motor racing politics. Stuart Codling weighs the life of a man whose work for safety on both road and track has saved hundreds of thousands of lives, but whose penchant for cruelty remains problematic and polarising.

Formula 1
Jun 12, 2021
Why pragmatic Perez isn't fazed by no-nonsense Red Bull F1 culture Prime

Why pragmatic Perez isn't fazed by no-nonsense Red Bull F1 culture

Sergio Perez has spent most of his career labouring in Formula 1’s midfield, wondering whether he’d ever get another shot at the big time. Red Bull has handed him that chance and, although life at the top is tough, the Baku winner is doing all the right things to get on terms with Max Verstappen, says BEN ANDERSON

Formula 1
Jun 11, 2021
What the data tells us about the F1 2021 title fight Prime

What the data tells us about the F1 2021 title fight

Formula 1 has been tracking car performance using timing loops mounted every 200m around each circuit – to the extent that it was able to anticipate Ferrari’s 'surprise’ pole in Monaco. PAT SYMONDS explains what this means for this season and beyond

Formula 1
Jun 10, 2021
The weighty issue F1 needs to find a balance with Prime

The weighty issue F1 needs to find a balance with

OPINION: After consecutive street races with contrasting highlights, one theme stood out which has become a prevalent issue with modern Formula 1 cars. But is there a way to solve it or, at least, reach a happy middle ground to help all parties?

Formula 1
Jun 10, 2021
The changes behind a 'feel-good' F1 result in Baku Prime

The changes behind a 'feel-good' F1 result in Baku

OPINION: The Azerbaijan Grand Prix had elements that make Formula 1 really exciting – unpredictability and shock results. This resulted in heartbreak for several of the championship’s regular contenders and joy for others who rarely reach the ultimate limelight. And one of those on the Baku podium is riding a wave of form he’s keen to continue

Formula 1
Jun 9, 2021
The human cost to replacing Formula 1's cancelled rounds Prime

The human cost to replacing Formula 1's cancelled rounds

OPINION: With the global pandemic still lingering, Singapore's grand prix has been cancelled for 2021, with more looking likely to follow. Although Formula 1 has TV deals and profits to chase, retaining a 23-race calendar could be most harmful to those who sacrifice the most for the championship.

Formula 1
Jun 8, 2021
Azerbaijan Grand Prix Driver Ratings Prime

Azerbaijan Grand Prix Driver Ratings

An eventful weekend in Baku full of incident and drama lent the race result an unusual feel, as three drivers scored their first podiums of the year. But it wasn't the eventual race winner who scored top marks in our driver ratings

Formula 1
Jun 7, 2021