Opinion: Why F1 needs the jeopardy of human error to spice up races

In the pursuit of engineering perfection, it is the man-made mistakes like Red Bull’s in Monaco that continue to ramp up the drama in Formula 1, says Kate Walker.

Opinion: Why F1 needs the jeopardy of human error to spice up races
During 70 laps, they all tried to push Gilles Villeneuve at fault and pass him; they never could and Gilles went on to win his 6th and last Grand Prix
Mark Webber, Red Bull Racing stops after a engine blow and fire
Kimi Raikkonen crashes in the last lap
Ralf Schumacher's engine blows up
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB12
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB12 pits late in the race with a puncture
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing congratulates Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing after his first F1 win
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB12
Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing climbs out of his car in parc ferme
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing
Start action: Nico Rosberg, Mercedes AMG F1 Team W07, Valtteri Bottas, Williams FW38 and Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 Team W07

One of the charges levelled against Formula 1 recently has been that the sport has reached a point where the pursuit of mechanical perfection has created an anodyne arena of predictability, and is bereft of the drama of the good old days.

Long gone, people say, are the times when a last-lap engine failure would leave the race leader out for the count, or a mistimed gear change would hand the on-track advantage to a rival. Or so the story goes…

In fact, one of the factors in the close racing enjoyed by F1 fans in 2016 has been the reintroduction of simple human error. The outcomes of the grands prix in both Monaco and Spain were influenced by teams simply getting it wrong, as Red Bull’s Daniel Ricciardo found out the hard way.

At the Circuit de Catalunya last month, Ricciardo was in with great chance of the race win, but the Australian driver lost out when the Red Bull pit wall elected to keep him on a three-stop strategy that proved not to be as quick as had been predicted.

The added value of fresh rubber in the final stint was negated by the loss of track position, and it was teammate Max Verstappen, on a two-stop, who claimed victory for Red Bull.

Two weeks later, at the Monaco Grand Prix, Ricciardo again lost out at the chance of victory thanks to another round of pitstop problems. Having planned to send their driver out on softs for his final stint, Red Bull decided to switch to the supersofts at the last moment, when they saw Lewis Hamilton had switched to the ultrasoft compound.

But it transpired that the tyres weren’t accessible in time, and the seconds Ricciardo lost sitting in his pitbox while the team rummaged were enough to cost him a second likely win in two weeks.

Extra variables have helped shake it up

Strategic bungles are part and parcel of F1, always have been, but the 2016 introduction of additional tyre compounds – and drivers’ individual rubber selections – has boosted the strategic options on offer, and as a consequence increased the possibility of simply getting it wrong relative to the competition.

Another factor has been the changes to both start procedures and team-car radio communications, both of which have made it easier for human error to creep in and keep things interesting.

So far, the 2016 F1 season has been a triumph of errors both human and mechanical. Hamilton’s predicted walkover title defense has been on the back foot since Melbourne, when a poor start from pole saw teammate Nico Rosberg claim victory.

A first-lap clash with the Wiliams of Valtteri Bottas cost the Briton another possible win in Bahrain, while power unit problems in qualifying in both China and Russia further contributed to a championship battle far tenser than any would have predicted in the pre-season.

Speaking in 2009, then-Ferrari team principal Stefano Domenicali reflected on human error in F1: “The procedural reliability is part of the overall reliability,” he said. “Human errors remain a characteristic of the team and the drivers, which gives a certain humanity to racing.

“We have tried to improve the procedures and we have introduced people from different areas to improve the procedures and increase concentration – but human error will always play a part.”

shares
comments
Honda to run new turbo in Canada

Previous article

Honda to run new turbo in Canada

Next article

Former Red Bull junior Chandhok defends Marko's approach

Former Red Bull junior Chandhok defends Marko's approach
Load comments
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog Prime

The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog

A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says Stuart Codling.

The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from Prime

The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from

OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix clash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences.

Formula 1
Sep 17, 2021
How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum Prime

How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum

With two sprint races under its belt, Formula 1 must now consider its options for them going forward. While they've helped deliver exciting racing on Sundays, the sprints themselves have been somewhat lacking - creating yet another conundrum for F1 to solve...

Formula 1
Sep 16, 2021
Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season? Prime

Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season?

OPINION: With Valtteri Bottas already signed up for 2022, all eyes are on the race for the second seat at Alfa Romeo next year. Antonio Giovinazzi is the current incumbent, but faces a tough competition from appealing short and long-term prospects

Formula 1
Sep 15, 2021
The "forced break" that was key to Ricciardo's Monza excellence Prime

The "forced break" that was key to Ricciardo's Monza excellence

OPINION: Daniel Ricciardo has long been considered one of Formula 1's elite drivers. But his struggles at McLaren since switching from Renault for 2021 have been painful to watch at times. Yet he's recovered to banish those memories with a famous Monza win – built on a critically important foundation

Formula 1
Sep 14, 2021
Italian Grand Prix driver ratings Prime

Italian Grand Prix driver ratings

Two drivers produced faultless performances as, for the second year in a row, Monza threw up an unpredictable result that left many to rue what might have been

Formula 1
Sep 13, 2021
Why Ricciardo would have won without Verstappen/Hamilton crash Prime

Why Ricciardo would have won without Verstappen/Hamilton crash

The clash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton was the major flashpoint the 2021 Italian Grand Prix will be remembered for. Yet by this point, race leader Daniel Ricciardo had already done the hard work that would put him in position to end his and McLaren's lengthy win droughts, on a memorable afternoon in Monza

Formula 1
Sep 13, 2021
Why Italian GP success is on for McLaren even if Verstappen dominates Prime

Why Italian GP success is on for McLaren even if Verstappen dominates

For the second time in 2021, McLaren will line up for the start of a grand prix from the first row. It knows it has the chance of "glory" if things go well for Daniel Ricciardo and Lando Norris at the start of the 2021 Italian Grand Prix, but even if they just maintain their grid positions, signs from the rest of the Monza weekend suggest success is very possible for Formula 1's other orange army

Formula 1
Sep 12, 2021