Formula 1
Renault 2003 technical debrief
2003 Season: Technical Debrief with Bernard Dudot The wide-angle RS23 V10 benefited from frequent developments during the 2003 season, to the point that the R23B was fighting for regular podiums during the final races of the championship. Bernard ...
Published: Nov 23, 2003, 8:06 PM
Copy link
Share on Viber
2003 Season: Technical Debrief with Bernard Dudot
The wide-angle RS23 V10 benefited from frequent developments during the 2003 season, to the point that the R23B was fighting for regular podiums during the final races of the championship. Bernard Dudot speaks about life at Viry during 2003.
Q: What is your verdict on the wide-angle engine concept?
Bernard Dudot: In 2003, this power-plant earned its place among a select group of engines that have won a Grand Prix. That is actually quite revealing: bad engines do not win races. I think the result was a fair reward for all the work of the engineers at Viry-Châtillon: they made a huge effort throughout the season, and the taste of victory certainly made up for some of their sleepless nights...
Q: Ten retirements in thirty-two starts: from a reliability point of view, the verdict is not quite as positive. Is that a worry?
BD: It is a fact that we lacked reliability. Had we finished every race in the positions where our cars were running when they retired, we could have been fighting with McLaren until the end of the championship. That is certainly a little frustrating, but we know what caused each retirement. These figures also demonstrate that the concept would not be suited to next season's regulations, which dictate the engine must complete at least 700km with a single block. A change in philosophy was necessary, and we are confident for 2004.
Q: The pace of development quickened in the second half of the season...
BD: Exactly. From Montreal onwards, our pace of development accelerated. Furthermore, as soon as we were sure of our fourth place in the Constructors' Championship, we allowed ourselves to take more technical risks. They did not always pay off, because higher engine speeds place more stress on a large number of components. However, the gain in power between Melbourne and Suzuka was significant.
Q: How many different evolutions did you use?
BD: Between the Australian Grand Prix and Japan, Renault used ten different engine specifications. That's an impressive total, and gives an indication of how hard the team at Viry-Châtillon was working.
Q: From a personal point of view, how was your season?
BD: It was a difficult year, because we were always pushing to the limit: every race was a balancing act between performance and reliability. As an F1 enthusiast, though, I have to say that 2003 was a vintage season, and I think the new points distribution system generated a closer championship. Looking ahead, I believe the new technical regulations will see some more changes in the balance of power, and that the championship will become even more competitive. That's good news for anybody who loves Formula 1.
-renault-
We want your opinion!
What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?
Take our 5 minute survey.
- The Motorsport.com Team
Read and post comments
Read also :
Share Or Save This Story
Copy link
Share on Viber
Previous article Trulli on provisional pole for US GP
Next article Nothing to lose for Coulthard
Top Comments
There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?
View More & Comment
More from
McLaren
The six drivers doing double duty in Portimao GTWCE and Barcelona WEC this weekend
WEC
WEC
Barcelona
9 h
The six drivers doing double duty in Portimao GTWCE and Barcelona WEC this weekend
Why McLaren cannot fix its F1 car handling until 2027
Formula 1
Formula 1
Singapore GP
Why McLaren cannot fix its F1 car handling until 2027
Latest news
Ricky Stenhouse explains his side of Michael McDowell conflict
NASCAR Cup
NAS NASCAR Cup
Charlotte II
2 h
Ricky Stenhouse explains his side of Michael McDowell conflict
Barnes: Why IndyCar’s updated licensing system fails its own integrity test
IndyCar
Indy IndyCar 4 h
Barnes: Why IndyCar’s updated licensing system fails its own integrity test
Why NASCAR is not penalizing Stenhouse, McDowell for post-race theatrics
NASCAR Cup
NAS NASCAR Cup
Charlotte II
5 h
Why NASCAR is not penalizing Stenhouse, McDowell for post-race theatrics
Dale Jr. explains why he doesn't use 'Earnhardt' in his signature
NASCAR Cup
NAS NASCAR Cup 6 h
Dale Jr. explains why he doesn't use 'Earnhardt' in his signature
Feature
Discover prime content
Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
You have 2 options:
- Become a subscriber.
- Disable your adblocker.
Subscribe now Already subscribed? Sign in here
Already disabled your adblocker?
Reload page
Manage Alerts
Subscribe