Breaking news

Formula 1

Renault hopes rivals were "honest" in 2019 rule research

Renault hopes rival Formula 1 teams were "honest" in conducting research into the proposed 2019 aero changes, which were approved despite the French manufacturer's opposition.

Jonathan Noble

Jonathan Noble

Published: Sep 26, 2018, 12:34 PM

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Add as a preferred source

Nico Hulkenberg, Renault Sport F1 Team R.S. 18 and Carlos Sainz Jr., Renault Sport F1 Team R.S. 18

In the wake of a lacklustre season opener in Australia, F1 chiefs pushed through with changes to cars for next year in a bid to help them follow each other more closely.

As well as changes to the front wing designs to limit outwash, brake ducts will be made simpler and the rear wing will be made wider and deeper.

Although the changes drew enough support from teams to get pushed through F1’s rule-making process, Renault says that its early testing of models had left it doubtful about the upside to such changes.

Renault F1 technical chief Marcin Budkowski said: “They [F1] asked us to run some cases to prove the direction they were choosing was right, and we actually didn’t feel it was the case.

“We didn’t feel the difference was big enough to justify a new set of regulations for next year, but other teams did.

"Hopefully they were as honest as we were, because we weren’t motivated by self-interest.”

Budkowski has no doubts that the new front wing rules will have a big impact on car airflow, and may well change the ability of cars to follow each other.

However, he is not sure it will be enough of a difference to be worth the effort of designing all-new cars.

“Our initial data suggested it would make a difference that was not of a magnitude that people wouldn’t recover with a lot of development,” he added.

“Don’t get me wrong. It is going to make a difference to the aero flow they have tried to change, but whether that is going to allow cars to follow each other closely, we are not convinced.

“Now we are in it, we hope it will for the good of the sport, but we have our doubts and that is why we didn’t support this change. But the majority did and we are happy to go with it.”

 

We want your opinion!

What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?

Take our 5 minute survey.

- The Motorsport.com Team

Read and post comments

Read also :

Share Or Save This Story

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Previous article F1 buys more time for Miami Grand Prix decision

Next article F1 should consider allowing one-off liveries - Brown

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

View More & Comment

More from

Jonathan Noble



Brundle awarded OBE in King’s New Year’s honours

Formula 1

Formula 1

Brundle awarded OBE in King’s New Year’s honours



The new rules dilemma that will define the 2025 F1 season

Formula 1

Formula 1

The new rules dilemma that will define the 2025 F1 season



Verstappen issues Red Bull title warning in push for RB21 progress

Formula 1

Formula 1

Australian GP

Verstappen issues Red Bull title warning in push for RB21 progress

More from

Renault F1 Team



“I went back to the car and cried” – Esteban Ocon opens up about his unexpected year on F1 sidelines

Formula 1

Formula 1

“I went back to the car and cried” – Esteban Ocon opens up about his unexpected year on F1 sidelines



You Ask The Questions: Robert Kubica

Formula 1

You Ask The Questions: Robert Kubica



On this day: Michael Schumacher’s final unsportsmanlike manoeuvre

Formula 1

Formula 1

Monaco GP

On this day: Michael Schumacher’s final unsportsmanlike manoeuvre

Latest news



Spire, Chris Gabehart reject Joe Gibbs Racing premise on deleted texts

NASCAR Cup

NAS NASCAR Cup

Charlotte II

23 min

Spire, Chris Gabehart reject Joe Gibbs Racing premise on deleted texts



Ricky Stenhouse explains his side of Michael McDowell conflict

NASCAR Cup

NAS NASCAR Cup

Charlotte II

4 h

Ricky Stenhouse explains his side of Michael McDowell conflict



Barnes: Why IndyCar’s updated licensing system fails its own integrity test

IndyCar

Indy IndyCar 5 h

Barnes: Why IndyCar’s updated licensing system fails its own integrity test



Why NASCAR is not penalizing Stenhouse, McDowell for post-race theatrics

NASCAR Cup

NAS NASCAR Cup

Charlotte II

6 h

Why NASCAR is not penalizing Stenhouse, McDowell for post-race theatrics

Feature

Discover prime content



Christian Horner's inside story of how Red Bull built its own F1 engine

Formula 1

By Jake Boxall-Legge

Christian Horner's inside story of how Red Bull built its own F1 engine



Exclusive video: Christian Horner interview on his Red Bull exit, Mercedes rivalry and more

Formula 1

By Autosport

Exclusive video: Christian Horner interview on his Red Bull exit, Mercedes rivalry and more



Why Mercedes' latest 2026 F1 update is no downgrade

Formula 1

Singapore GP

By Jake Boxall-Legge

Why Mercedes' latest 2026 F1 update is no downgrade



'Senior moment' or breakdown of trust? The implications of Hamilton's Singapore GP meltdown

Formula 1

Singapore GP

By Stuart Codling

'Senior moment' or breakdown of trust? The implications of Hamilton's Singapore GP meltdown

Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.

From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.

You have 2 options:

Subscribe now Already subscribed? Sign in here

Already disabled your adblocker?
Reload page

Manage Alerts

Subscribe