Subscribe

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Motorsport prime

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Edition

Australia

Rival teams rejected F1 2017 shark fin ban, claims Red Bull

The F1 Commission, including the majority of rival F1 teams, voted to reject an attempt to remove a loophole in the regulations that allowed shark fins for 2017, claims Red Bull team principal Christian Horner.

Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB13

Photo by: XPB Images

Felipe Massa, Williams FW40
Sergio Perez, Force India VJM10
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB13
Williams FW40 T-wing detail
Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 W08
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB13
Carlos Sainz Jr., Scuderia Toro Rosso STR12
Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 W08 with open shark fin

Large shark fins have appeared on the rear bodywork of this year’s cars, as they provide an aerodynamic performance advantage through the corners. 

But Horner, speaking on the opening day of pre-season testing at Barcelona, believes they should be removed for aesthetic reasons.

“The cars look fantastic,” said Horner. “The only thing that lets them down is the shark fins. 

“It’s something we raised at the F1 Strategy Group meeting last year, to ask all teams to remove them because it’s pretty marginal, the performance gain they offer. 

“In the interest of aesthetics, it was requested they be removed. 

“That went to the F1 Commission and unfortunately it was immediately rejected by the majority of teams so hopefully it’s something that can be addressed for next year. 

“The cars look great. it’s a shame this shark fin has crept into a loophole in the regulations.”

Looks are important

Horner said that, while the shark fin does provide a performance gain, ensuring the car looks good remains an important factor that must be taken into consideration. 

“If you ask our aerodynamicists, they would like to retain it,” he said.

“The cars look more aggressive, they look more challenging and it’s wrong to ignore the aesthetics of the car. 

“Unfortunately, this is a consequence of the rules but one that should have been able to be addressed quite quickly.”

Suspension system a non-issue

Meanwhile, Horner believes his team’s suspension system is within the regulations after the outfit consulted the FIA.

There has been debate among teams readapting the legality of clever hydraulic suspension systems in F1 since Ferrari sought clarification of the rules. 

“The FIA appear to be happy with the way we have interpreted the rules,” said Horner. “If anybody has a problem with that, they have the right to protest. 

“We can only go on the advice we receive from the governing body. 

“Certainly all the feedback we’ve had has been – [there is] no issue.”

Be part of Motorsport community

Join the conversation
Previous article McLaren says Honda troubles "unexpected"
Next article Barcelona F1 test: Hamilton and Mercedes top opening day

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Motorsport prime

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Edition

Australia