Tech analysis: How Williams and STR try to reverse downward trend
The second half of the season is proving tough for Toro Rosso and Williams, who are doing their best to stop losing ground to its main rivals.
Giorgio Piola's F1 technical analysis
Giorgio Piola is the preeminent Formula 1 technical journalist. View our full selection of Giorgio's technical illustrative content
Williams
Williams' search for performance continues, as it battles over fourth place in the championship with the other Mercedes-powered team - Force India.
Having struggled to get additional performance from updates this season, the team soldiered on in Belgium using all the components we've seen so far.
However, one thing that was was missing on the FW38 was the winglet usually mounted astride the airbox. It's believed this winglet was used to clear up airflow that would otherwise be destructive to the rear wing.
With the new wing design not operating as expected since its introduction in Baku, it seems the team have highlighted the airbox winglet as a potential problem, especially in transient conditions.
Toro Rosso
Toro Rosso had a huge package of parts that amounted to a B-Spec at the last race in Germany. However, the team wasn't happy with the overall results, expecting a leap in performance in the same realm as Force India made at Barcelona.
At Spa the team wanted to re-balance the car, planning to run its low-downforce rear wing (above), which features shorter chord flaps, set at a much shallower angle, and only two of the displaced endplate louvres STR pioneered this season.
In order to balance things up, the new front wing's upper flap was cut down to take some load off the front end (upper arrow), whilst the tip was also revised in order to change how the Y250 vortex forms below (lower arrow).
As part of the update in Germany the team reduced the number of vortex generators on the sidepod's leading edge by one, owing to the use of the conjoined vertical airflow conditioner, which arches over to meet with the sidepod's shoulder.
However, for Belgium the team went one step further, removing the other vortex generator in the hopes of changing the sidepod's aerodynamic operating window.
Share Or Save This Story
The fascinating story behind McLaren's most iconic F1 car
Emilia Romagna GP: F1 technical images from Imola's pitlane
The F1 downforce choices that proved key at the Saudi GP
Lewis Hamilton summoned to F1 stewards after Azerbaijan GP incident
Arvid Lindblad nearly flips world's shortest Fiat Panda in bizarre YouTube challenge
How Arvid Lindblad has shown that he's found his feet in F1
Lando Norris: McLaren’s Baku deficit is a “knife in the heart”
Imola building grandstands, Abu Dhabi plan A – What’s really going on with F1’s season finale?
Cadillac makes three major tech hires including former Red Bull design chief
Jamie Chadwick reflects on "surreal" maiden Williams F1 test
A look at McLaren and Audi's Baku F1 updates
Fernando Alonso’s idea to ‘save’ F1 before the V8 return – and how realistic it is
Top 10 F1 results changed by backmarkers – the clashes
Ten years of Baku: Can F1 2026 bring back the fear factor?
Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
Top Comments