Formula 1
Formula 1
28 Mar
FP1 in
26 days
R
Emilia Romagna GP
18 Apr
Race in
49 days
09 May
Next event in
67 days
23 May
Race in
84 days
R
Azerbaijan GP
06 Jun
Race in
98 days
13 Jun
Race in
105 days
27 Jun
Race in
119 days
04 Jul
Next event in
123 days
18 Jul
Race in
140 days
R
Hungarian GP
01 Aug
Race in
154 days
29 Aug
Race in
182 days
05 Sep
Race in
189 days
12 Sep
Race in
196 days
26 Sep
Race in
210 days
R
Singapore GP
03 Oct
Next event in
214 days
10 Oct
Race in
224 days
R
United States GP
24 Oct
Race in
238 days
31 Oct
Race in
245 days
R
Australian GP
21 Nov
Race in
266 days
R
Saudi Arabia GP
05 Dec
Race in
280 days
R
Abu Dhabi GP
12 Dec
Race in
287 days
Giorgio Piola's F1 technical analysis
Topic

Giorgio Piola's F1 technical analysis

Why F1's 2021 floor changes could alter the pecking order

While Formula 1's 2021 cars will feature a lot of carry over from last year, the changes that are being made have huge potential to mix things up.

shares
comments
Why F1's 2021 floor changes could alter the pecking order

Some of those new elements will be part of general season-on-season improvement, but it is the new floor rules that could yet play a decisive role in swinging the competitive order around.

And there is a potentially interesting scenario playing out where the tweaks to the floor - part of a raft of changes aimed at cutting downforce by 10 percent – could favour either the Mercedes or Red Bull concept.

For what initially appeared to be an innocuous change to the floor area ahead of the rear tyre, has actually manifested itself as something quite significant.

Andy Green, who is technical director of the renamed Aston Martin squad, said after evaluating the impact of the new floor last year: "It's a huge change, believe it not. A small change relatively speaking to the floor has had quite a significant impact on the performance of the car.

"It's not just a redevelopment of the floor, unfortunately, it's a redevelopment almost of the front to back aerodynamics of the car to try and recover it."

Given Red Bull's high rake arrangement, the initial thought was that it could come off worse because of the new floors. However, others argue that Mercedes could actually be the ones hurt the most from the arrangement.

Here we take a look at what's at stake and how it could impact both teams.

Going through changes

Firstly, it's key to understand what's changing. The interim regulations implemented by the FIA were a means of countering the downforce that's been added by teams since the regulations were changed in 2019.

Floor rules comparison 2020-2021
2021 brakes fins Race

The FIA's opening salvo was to create a diagonal cutout in the floor ahead of the rear tyre. But, the data accumulated during the first few races of the season proved that this alone would result in them falling some way short of their 10 percent downforce reduction target.

As such, the governing body swiftly followed this up by announcing further changes - a reduction in the width of the rear brake duct winglets and a height reduction for the diffuser strakes.

Not content with this, or perhaps having realised the designs that might emerge as a consequence of leaving things as they were, the FIA made another alteration at the 11th hour, preventing the use of fully enclosed holes in the floor.

Meanwhile, Pirelli made a U-turn too and pushed to bring new tyres. It plans to supply a revised tyre for 2021 that will not only handle the demands placed on the tyres more effectively, but also allow the Italian tyre manufacturer to prescribe lower minimum starting pressures for the coming season.

Mercedes AMG F1 W11 tyre check

Mercedes AMG F1 W11 tyre check

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

This is crucial, as it means that the teams not only have new rules to focus on, they also have to deal with a revised tyre construction. This ramps up the aerodynamic challenge significantly, as they now have a relatively unknown variable in the middle of all the other technical changes.

This is a battle that aerodynamicists have been tackling for decades but one which has certainly seemed to take centre stage as the team's find gains with infinitesimal tweaks.

But, whilst it's easy to think about how the rear tyre behaves in the centre of this storm, there's also the front tyre to consider. A different deformation characteristic here means any flow structure created to deal with the turbulence it generates will also have to be tuned to recover that performance.

This means that teams will not only have to make alterations to the parts directly affected by the regulation changes, but pretty much every aerodynamic surface on the car as they relink the aerodynamic connections that have been severed by the regulation changes and new tyres.

The rake factor

Ferrari SF1000 rake

Ferrari SF1000 rake

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Circling back to the assumption that rake would be a factor in deciding who will be hit worse by the regulation changes, let's take a look at how that might have come about.

The term rake is used to describe the nose down attitude of the car and is perhaps most widely associated with Red Bull and its lineage of cars since 2009.

It's also a design trait that has been almost universally adopted by the entire grid too, as it's widely accepted that, if the conditions are right, a car designed with a higher rake angle will be able to generate more downforce from the floor and diffuser than one at a lower angle.

This is down to the additional volume that's created between the underside of the floor/diffuser and the ground.

However, if you cannot effectively seal the edge of this volume, you will lose any potential downforce that can be generated and start to have some unwanted side effects instead.

This is likely why there was a belief that Red Bull would suffer the most when it comes to the new regulations, as the diagonal floor cutout removes some of the aerodynamic tools it has been using over the last few years to create that 'seal'.

Red Bull RB7 blown diffuser

Red Bull RB7 blown diffuser

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

But all teams have regularly been using fully enclosed holes that stretch almost the entire length of the floor, rather than in the section just ahead of the rear tyre, to make gains in this area too.

Ferrari SF1000 floor

Ferrari SF1000 floor

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

These longitudinal holes, which we must remember are now banned for 2021, are used as a way of sealing the edge of the entire floor, not just the rear section and diffuser. This means the floor becomes an extension of the diffuser and is where we begin to crossover into Mercedes territory.

As we've already established, Red Bull's high rake potentially increases the volume of its diffuser due to the increased ground clearance, whereas Mercedes' low-line rake philosophy, tied to its longer wheelbase, gives it more floor space to create that volume in the area ahead of the diffuser.

Interestingly, the novel low-line rake philosophy used by Mercedes is a continuation of the car's design DNA that was present even before its dominant reign began in the hybrid era. It hadn't followed the rest of the flock and taken on Red Bull's high rake approach, favouring its own blend of chassis and aerodynamic compliance instead.

However, with FRIC removed during 2014 and, with it, some of the control the team had over the aerodynamic platform, a longer wheelbase was used as a countermeasure.

This probably became more significant in 2017 due to the regulations changes that would affect the aerodynamic handshake the floor has with the diffuser and led to the W08 being known as a bit of a diva.

In the time that's passed since, Mercedes ironed out some of these issues but the introduction of these new regulations will test that resolve, as with relatively more floor stolen from it by the diagonal cutout, it will once again have to address the aerodynamic kinship of the proximal flow structures.

Could both lose out?

If you look at it objectively it seems that both short wheelbase/high rake and long wheelbase/low rake philosophies are going to take a hit then.

But, how much will depend on the reliance each has on the aerodynamic functionality of the outgoing fully enclosed holes on their floor and diffuser, when compared with the losses they'll initially accrue from the trimming down of the floor, brake ducts and diffuser.

The thing to remember though, is whilst 10% was the FIA's target, it's not a figure that will be representative for every team.

The same can be said if you take each change in isolation, with the brake duct winglets being trimmed back likely to hurt one team more than another too.

Right now there is not a clear answer as to who comes off worse, but there seems no doubt it is going to have an impact. Maybe there is a scenario where both come off badly, and they fall back into the chasing pack...

Carlos Sainz Jr., McLaren MCL35 with a 2021 spec floor

Carlos Sainz Jr., McLaren MCL35 with a 2021 spec floor
1/7

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

McLaren was the first to test a 2021 specification parts, as the MCL35 was outfitted with a floor that featured the diagonal cutout at the Belgian GP.

Ferrari SF1000 floor detail with 2021 rules

Ferrari SF1000 floor detail with 2021 rules
2/7

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Ferrari first showed its hand at the Portuguese GP, trialling a variant of the 2021 floor that featured a dog-eared rear corner that will roll up the airflow ahead of the rear tyre.

Ferrari SF1000 2021 diffuser

Ferrari SF1000 2021 diffuser
3/7

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

This was paired with a diffuser that had the strakes cut back to account for the new regulations.

Renault F1 Team R.S.20 floor 2021

Renault F1 Team R.S.20 floor 2021
4/7

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Renault rolled out a 2021 specification floor in Bahrain on Ricciardo’s car, before giving Ocon a taster in Abu Dhabi.

Haas F1 Team VF-20 floor comparison

Haas F1 Team VF-20 floor comparison
5/7

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Haas trialled a 2021 style floor in Abu Dhabi that featured a dog-eared outer lip and a horizontal flap mounted above the floor by means of the vertical strake.

Ferrari SF1000 floor comparison, Abu Dhabi GP

Ferrari SF1000 floor comparison, Abu Dhabi GP
6/7

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Ferrari trialled a new variant of the 2021 specification floor in Abu Dhabi, discarding the dog-eared lip in favour of a series of fins in that region.

Red Bull Racing RB16 floor detail

Red Bull Racing RB16 floor detail
7/7

Photo by: Charles Coates / Motorsport Images

Red Bull trialled 2021 specification parts in Portugal that were mounted on the car again in Abu Dhabi. The floor obviously featured the diagonal cutout but ahead of the rear tyre a twisted strake could be found that will have an effect on airflow as it passes around the tyre.

Related video

Suzuki confirms Brivio departure ahead of Alpine F1 switch

Previous article

Suzuki confirms Brivio departure ahead of Alpine F1 switch

Next article

Why Alpine's latest signing could be its best hope of F1 glory

Why Alpine's latest signing could be its best hope of F1 glory
Load comments

About this article

Series Formula 1
Author Matt Somerfield
How McLaren F1’s new investors have already made an impact Prime

How McLaren F1’s new investors have already made an impact

The deal McLaren concluded with MSP Sports Capital last year which will help the cash-strapped Formula 1 team pay for much-needed infrastructure upgrades, also points toward the future for F1 itself, says GP Racing's Stuart Codling.

Why Verstappen isn't interested in the hype game Prime

Why Verstappen isn't interested in the hype game

In a pre-season where Red Bull has been unusually quiet, Max Verstappen has also been guarded about the team's fortunes in 2021. Even after trying the RB16B for the first time at Silverstone, the Dutchman was careful to manage expectations

Formula 1
Feb 26, 2021
The pros and cons of F1's 2021 rule changes Prime

The pros and cons of F1's 2021 rule changes

In the strategy for grand prix racing's future, 2021 represents a significant step towards the goal of closer racing and a more level playing field. That's the theory behind the latest raft of changes, but will they have the desired effect?

Formula 1
Feb 24, 2021
What Red Bull is trying to hide with its RB16B launch Prime

What Red Bull is trying to hide with its RB16B launch

Red Bull made no secret of the fact its 2021 F1 car is an evolution of its predecessor, but in keeping the same foundations while hiding some tightly-guarded updates with its RB16B, the team aims to avoid suffering the same pitfalls of previous years

Formula 1
Feb 23, 2021
How Albon plans to fight his way out of Red Bull limbo Prime

How Albon plans to fight his way out of Red Bull limbo

Alex Albon has faced the media for the first time since he lost his Red Bull drive at the end of 2020 and dropped out of a Formula 1 race seat altogether. He has a history of bouncing back from setbacks, so here's what he must do to rise again

Formula 1
Feb 23, 2021
Ranked! Carlin's greatest F1 graduates Prime

Ranked! Carlin's greatest F1 graduates

Carlin has helped guide enough drivers to Formula 1 to fill out an entire grid, plus a handful of reserves, to create a remarkable alumni list. With Yuki Tsunoda set to join that group, Motorsport.com has ranked its graduates to grace the grand prix scene...

Formula 1
Feb 22, 2021
Why Alfa's 2021 launch says more about its 2022 plans Prime

Why Alfa's 2021 launch says more about its 2022 plans

Alfa Romeo launched its C41 with a revised front nose, but there's little to suggest it will surge up the leaderboard in 2021. As the team frankly admits, it's putting its eggs in the basket labelled 2022 and hoping to hold the eighth place it earned last year

Formula 1
Feb 22, 2021
Why Gasly’s AlphaTauri haven is a blessing and a curse Prime

Why Gasly’s AlphaTauri haven is a blessing and a curse

Red Bull opted not to re-sign Pierre Gasly even before it decided to drop Alex Albon and so the Frenchman's Formula 1 journey will continue at AlphaTauri. This has positive and negative connotations for one of last season's star performers.

Formula 1
Feb 20, 2021