Formula 1 Qatar GP

Why Hamilton's Losail and Norris's Jeddah false starts were treated differently

There is sound reasoning behind why Hamilton was penalised for a false start in Qatar when Norris was cleared of any wrongdoing earlier in the season

Ewan Gale

Published: Dec 4, 2024, 3:15 PM

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Add as a preferred source

Fernando Alonso, Aston Martin AMR24, Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24, Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes F1 W15, Valtteri Bottas, KICK Sauber C44, the remainder of the field

Fernando Alonso, Aston Martin AMR24, Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24, Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes F1 W15, Valtteri Bottas, KICK Sauber C44, the remainder of the field

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

Lewis Hamilton was penalised at the Qatar Grand Prix for a false start having moved - and then stopped - before the lights went out to begin the race.

The Mercedes driver picked up his first penalty of a trying race when he nudged forward early, though his loss of momentum as he tried to correct the error saw him lose spots off the line.

Seven-time world champion Hamilton was downcast after the race when holding his hands up for the error, as well as his later penalty for speeding in the pits, saying: "It could have been worse, but I finished and it's over.

"That was me at the start. And then the puncture was really unfortunate. And the pitlane, that was me as well. I'll do my best, but I'll get back up tomorrow and give it another shot."

But the consistency of penalty application had arisen on social media amid the debate around the FIA's decision-making at the Losail International Circuit, with some pointing to Lando Norris's lack of punishment for a similar misjudgement at the start at this year's Saudi Arabian Grand Prix.

So why was Hamilton punished and Norris wasn't?

What did Norris do?

At the second round in Jeddah, Norris did almost the exact same thing as Hamilton had done in nudging forward in his grid box before the lights extinguished, before stopping and then getting going with a loss of momentum.

The 'false start' was noted by Hamilton's Mercedes team-mate George Russell, who was straight onto his team radio to call "false start Norris" as he breezed by the McLaren.

But it transpired that Norris had failed to trigger the FIA transponder at the start, meaning that because of the absence of an alert from the sensor, he was spared a penalty.

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38, George Russell, Mercedes F1 W15, Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes F1 W15, Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR24, Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team VCARB 01, the remainder of the field at the start

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38, George Russell, Mercedes F1 W15, Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes F1 W15, Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR24, Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team VCARB 01, the remainder of the field at the start

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

The stewards's report at the event read: "The Stewards reviewed positioning/marshalling system data, video and determined that the video appeared to show that Car 4 moved before the start signal was given.

"However, the FIA-approved and supplied transponder fitted on the car did not indicate a jump start. Article 48.1 a) of the Formula One Sporting Regulations states clearly that the judgment of whether or not there was a jump start is to be made in accordance with the transponder, which did not show a jump start. In the circumstances, we took no further action."

What was different for Hamilton?

As the stewards's report states from the past weekend: "The FIA transponder indicated a false start. This was confirmed by examination of the video evidence from the on-board camera of Car 44.  As the start of Car 44 was only very slightly ahead of the start signal, the minimum penalty is applied."

The fact the transponder was triggered is the first point of difference between the two incidents, even though they look near-identical. But in truth, Hamilton was more likely to be penalised anyway, given a major change to the regulations following discussions at the F1 Commission meeting held between the Chinese and Australian Grands Prix.

Read Also:

Confusion over Norris's non-penalty, given it was obvious to the eye that there was a false start, led to a change in the wording of the regulations, with the sentence that determined any jumps could be found only by the transponder being triggered removed from the rulebook.

A revision to Article 48.1 a) of the Sporting Regulations instead states than an offence will be deemed to have taken place if a driver is judged to have: "moved after the four (4) second light is illuminated and before the start signal is given by extinguishing all red lights."

Therefore, regardless of Hamilton's transponder being triggered on Sunday, the Briton would have been punished under the revised regulation anyway.

This was no inconsistency from the FIA or the race stewards, but rather all parties learning from a confusing situation and putting things right.

We want your opinion!

What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?

Take our 5 minute survey.

- The Motorsport.com Team

Read and post comments

Read also :

Share Or Save This Story

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Previous article Arthur Leclerc to join brother Charles at Ferrari for Abu Dhabi FP1

Next article Why Zandvoort is giving up on F1 before Verstappen

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

View More & Comment

More from

Ewan Gale



Why Christian Horner banned Mercedes' name as Red Bull built its own F1 engine

Formula 1

Formula 1

Singapore GP

Why Christian Horner banned Mercedes' name as Red Bull built its own F1 engine



F1's top 10 closest finishes after George Russell holds off Max Verstappen's late Baku challenge

Formula 1

Formula 1

Azerbaijan GP

F1's top 10 closest finishes after George Russell holds off Max Verstappen's late Baku challenge



Why struggling F1 teams can't follow Ferrari's aggressive upgrade plan

Formula 1

Formula 1

Why struggling F1 teams can't follow Ferrari's aggressive upgrade plan

More from

Lando Norris



Why McLaren cannot fix its F1 car handling until 2027

Formula 1

Formula 1

Singapore GP

Why McLaren cannot fix its F1 car handling until 2027



Andrea Stella praises Lando Norris for reaction to Singapore GP sprint clash

Formula 1

Formula 1

Singapore GP

Andrea Stella praises Lando Norris for reaction to Singapore GP sprint clash



F1 doesn't need to change its VSC rules despite Lando Norris' Spain loss

Formula 1

Spanish GP

F1 doesn't need to change its VSC rules despite Lando Norris' Spain loss

Latest news



GTA VI 'Vice City' blimp to appear at NASCAR championship weekend

NASCAR Cup

NAS NASCAR Cup

Phoenix II

35 min

GTA VI 'Vice City' blimp to appear at NASCAR championship weekend



Verstappen Racing struggles to 15th as Porsche takes emotional Portimao pole

GT World Challenge Europe Endurance

WCEE GT World Challenge Europe Endurance 1 h

Verstappen Racing struggles to 15th as Porsche takes emotional Portimao pole



Franco Colapinto urges fans to stop the abuse: “You’re not helping me or my future”

Formula 1

F1 Formula 1

Singapore GP

5 h

Franco Colapinto urges fans to stop the abuse: “You’re not helping me or my future”



Gresini: New MotoGP rules won't increase gap between factory and satellite teams

MotoGP

MGP MotoGP

Indonesian GP

5 h

Gresini: New MotoGP rules won't increase gap between factory and satellite teams

Feature

Discover prime content



Lights, Camara, action: How Haas picked F1's latest rookie for 2027

Formula 1

Singapore GP

By Jake Boxall-Legge

Lights, Camara, action: How Haas picked F1's latest rookie for 2027



Employing team orders can simply be a matter of common sense

Formula 1

By Kevin Turner

Employing team orders can simply be a matter of common sense



Why Christian Horner sees history repeating itself for Adrian Newey at Aston Martin

Formula 1

Singapore GP

By Ronald Vording

Why Christian Horner sees history repeating itself for Adrian Newey at Aston Martin



Laurent Mekies under the microscope: How different is his leadership at Red Bull from Christian Horner?

Formula 1

Singapore GP

By Ronald Vording

Laurent Mekies under the microscope: How different is his leadership at Red Bull from Christian Horner?

Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.

From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.

You have 2 options:

Subscribe now Already subscribed? Sign in here

Already disabled your adblocker?
Reload page

Manage Alerts

Subscribe