F1 engineers discuss the Ducati MotoGP aero dispute
The controversial winglet ran by Ducati's Andrea Dovizioso on his way to victory in the MotoGP season-opening Qatar Grand Prix generates downforce, according to Formula 1 engineers.

Honda, Aprilia, Suzuki and KTM lodged a complaint against Ducati over the legality of the winglet, which the Italian manufacturer attached to the swingarm of its bike, claiming it is used to cool down the rear tyre.
While stewards in Qatar threw out the protest, the case was referred to the FIM Court of Appeals and a decision is expected before the next race in Argentina.
Ducati's rivals believe the primary purpose of the winglet is to generate additional downforce.
Earlier this year, MotoGP technical director Danny Aldridge sent a note to all teams, opening the door for such add-ons to be used in dry races, as previously such a deflector could only be used in the wet to disperse water from around the tyre.
Motorsport.com asked ex-Formula 1 engineers to analyse the Ducati winglet and they believe there is no doubt the winglet creates aerodynamic load.
Ex-Ferrari F1 engineer Toni Cuquerella told Motorsport.com: "It's obvious that Ducati's winglet generates downforce. First of all, because any part that's exposed the way that one is produces it, and it could even help reduce the bike's drag.
"You have to keep in mind also that the effect it creates has a direct impact on the rear end. Since it's attached to the swingarm, the airflow must not be passing though any other part of the bike.
"The problem is that the way the rules are written, you open a Pandora's box because there might be no specific way to ban it."
Cuquerella, now chief engineer of the Mahindra Formula E team, added: "The FIM now faces the need to clarify the situation. It appears obvious that Ducati is ahead of the rest in terms of aerodynamics, and that they were very smart in how they interpreted a void in the rules."
A McLaren F1 team-employed aero expert who preferred to remain anonymous agreed with Cuquerella's view.
"It's obvious that the device generates downforce. Probably less than the winglets on the fairing, but of course it generates downforce," the British team's engineer said.
The fact that the stewards in charge of reviewing the protest filed by Aprilia, Suzuki, Honda and KTM decided to refer the case to the MotoGP Court of Appeals was the first sign of the mess that was knocking on the ruling body's door.
"In F1, aerodynamics have had a major impact on the performance of the cars for the past 30 years. In motorcycling, the impact is smaller, so it's normal that FIM is not used to dealing with this kind of cheekiness," said Cuquerella.
"But even in F1 there have recently been cases where a loophole in the regulations allowed a smart team to interpret the rules in such a way that it managed to use something that it was initially banned. We can't forget Brawn GP's double diffuser and Red Bull's blown diffuser."
Last summer, the Grand Prix commission approved a rule - voted against by Ducati - that aimed to stop the teams' from investing in aerodynamics development, in order to slow down the escalating costs associated with it.
However, the fact that Ducati's winglet is attached to the swingarm and is not recognised by the regulations as a part of the bike's aero body, opened the door for the Italian engineers to introduce the device without breaking the rules.
Cuquerella concluded: "When Ducati told MotoGP technical director Danny Aldridge that the main function of the device was not to direct water away from the wheel but to cool the rear tyre down, they managed to get it approved for dry races.
"The FIM will have to rewrite the technical regulations, because what's obvious is that it won't be able to take the bikes, one by one, and put them in a wind tunnel to quantify the amount of downforce that each part generates.
"You can't ban parts that generate downforce if you can't prove that they are generating it. What you can do is specify some dimensions in the rules."
Ducati remains confident that the device is within the regulations and says it would not have installed it had it had any doubts about its legality.
"We are calm because we know that we have followed the technical regulations," sporting director Paolo Ciabatti told Motorsport.com in Qatar.
"There is a note that was distributed among the teams on March 2, which clearly specified how you could use this type of deflector on the back of the bike.
"If we had considered that this element could pose a risk of punishment, we would not have run with it. But it's not like that."

Previous article
Ducati threatens Honda protest as winglet row escalates
Next article
Marquez: Honda couldn't tolerate Ducati speed deficit

About this article
Series | MotoGP |
Teams | Ducati Team |
Author | Oriol Puigdemont |
F1 engineers discuss the Ducati MotoGP aero dispute
Repsol Honda Team - Pol Espargaró Q&A
Repsol Honda Team - Marc Marquez Q&A
Why Alex Marquez doesn't care about 'shutting up' MotoGP critics
Alex Marquez's form was one of MotoGP 2020's biggest surprises and, by firmly stepping out of his six-time world champion brother Marc's shadow, he proved a few people wrong. Not that he cares about this, as he tells Lewis Duncan
How Yamaha's new MotoGP era can unchain Vinales
After the electrifying start to his Yamaha MotoGP career in 2017, Maverick Vinales has struggled for consistency. Many anticipate that the arrival of Fabio Quartararo could spell disaster, but the departure of Valentino Rossi could be just the impetus he needs.
Does KTM really need 'super engine' for MotoGP title challenge?
Fears from rival MotoGP manufacturers that KTM would build a 'super engine' for 2021 have ultimately come to nothing with the revealation that the RC16 hasn't been radically changed over the winter. But does it really need that to win the title?
How Ducati's latest Aussie union can return it to MotoGP glory
Australians on Ducatis is an iconic partnership, the marque's last one yielding its sole MotoGP crown to date. But its latest Aussie union with the often underestimated Jack Miller can end this drought.
The "balls out" battle between MotoGP's true greats
Senna vs Prost is regularly cited as motorsport's greatest rivalry. But it can easily be argued Rainey vs Schwantz can stake that claim. That rivalry was in full swing during the 1991 500cc season, remembered fondly by both stars 30 years on...
The "warrior" MotoGP rookie KTM was right to back
The 2020 MotoGP campaign featured a standout pair of rookies, but one flew under the radar as he adjusted to a shock step-up armed with very little racing experience. However as his veteran team boss explains, the faith shown in him was not misplaced
Why Suzuki's Brivio replacement must come from within
With its charismatic leader Davide Brivio leaving for Formula 1, the Suzuki MotoGP squad he turned into a world championship-winning force in 2020 has a major recruitment headache that it needs to resolve carefully.
Why Alpine's latest signing could be its best hope of F1 glory
The return of Fernando Alonso to the renamed Alpine team is a sure sign of the team's ambition. But its latest appointment from MotoGP could be an even bigger coup as it seeks to end a barren run stretching back to Alonso's 2006 world title