Commentary

NASCAR Cup

Can NASCAR solve calendar criticism in 2020?

The NASCAR Cup series calendar was one of the year's biggest talking points as leading drivers criticized it, but major changes cannot come before 2020.

Tom Errington

Edited: Dec 31, 2018, 2:49 PM

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Add as a preferred source

restart Ricky Stenhouse Jr., Roush Fenway Racing, Ford Fusion Fifth Third Bank

Overall view of pre-race activities

Chase Elliott, Hendrick Motorsports, Chevrolet Camaro Kelley Blue Book and Paul Menard, Wood Brothers Racing, Ford Fusion Menards / Cardell

Homestead-Miami Speedway atmosphere

Kevin Harvick, Stewart-Haas Racing, Ford Fusion Busch Light and #9: Chase Elliott, Hendrick Motorsports, Chevrolet Camaro NAPA Auto Parts

Martin Truex Jr., Furniture Row Racing, Toyota Camry Auto-Owners Insurance, Paul Menard, Wood Brothers Racing, Ford Fusion Motorcraft / Quick Lane Tire & Auto Center

Jimmie Johnson, Hendrick Motorsports, Chevrolet Camaro Lowe's for Pros

Regan Smith, Leavine Family Racing, Chevrolet Camaro WRL General Contractors

Brad Keselowski, Team Penske, Ford Fusion Alliance Truck Parts

Brad Keselowski, Team Penske, Ford Fusion Discount Tire and Clint Bowyer, Stewart-Haas Racing, Ford Fusion Mobil 1/Rush Truck Centers

Joey Logano, Team Penske, Ford Fusion Shell Pennzoil with his Championship trophy

Kurt Busch was the most critical this year, describing the series current calendar as "stale" and suggesting the Cup series should visit popular tracks outside the calendar for midweek races. 

Kevin Harvick, like Busch, believes that the season finale should be rotated between venues in an attempt to emulate the NFL's Super Bowl. 

There has been a groundswell of criticism regarding "cookie-cutter tracks" or 1.5-mile tracks, deemed to be too similar to each other and lacking interest compared to other circuits. That's led to a demand for more short tracks like the popular Bristol.

It was no surprise that in the yearly state of NASCAR media conference, president Steve Phelps was asked for his take on the calendar.

"I think everything is in play. So we've heard from our fan base that they would like to see more short track racing," he said. "They want to see more road courses. They want to see less cookie-cutter tracks, whatever that means. 

"I think that we are looking with our broadcast partners and with our tracks and with our teams and drivers to get input on what each of them believes would be an ideal schedule, and then we're obviously doing fan research as part of it. 

"So do I believe that everything is on the table? I do. 

"Will we see a lot of the things that have been talked about, so more short tracks, more road courses, double‑headers, midweek racing, pulling the season forward? All those things would be in play."

Introduction of the Roval

In fairness to NASCAR, it did make changes for 2018. The addition of Charlotte's Roval proved highly popular after an exciting first race and changes such as a second Las Vegas race and a rearranged Indianapolis were also met with approval.

But NASCAR can currently do very little to counteract the criticism immediately, with its calendar largely predetermined through to 2020. 

This is because the series signed long-term deals with the tracks back in 2015, with a narrow window of dates for the two major track-owning companies: The International Speedway Corporation and Speedway Motorsports Inc. 

The two companies own all but three tracks on the 2018 calendar -  Indianapolis, Pocono and Dover are the exceptions - meaning just fives races a year fall outside of their jurisdiction. 

The ISC is also owned by the NASCAR's France family and the series recently offered to buy the remaining shares of ISC it did not own in order to merge the two companies in a future-looking and "strategic" move.

Other changes

Other pushes from drivers this year have included less races per year and midweek events in the ilk of the NFL and MLB, and even a shared weekend with IndyCar has been mooted by those within the series. 

One thing is for certain, NASCAR will need to react. In a year that was critical for NASCAR after the exit of several star names, Sports Media Watch reported that 27 2018 races hit new lows or decade-plus lows in viewership.

Logano's title win at Homestead was the least-watched finale since 2001 and adds further credence to the idea that NASCAR needs a shake up in its near future.

We want your opinion!

What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?

Take our 5 minute survey.

- The Motorsport.com Team

Read and post comments

Read also :

Share Or Save This Story

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Previous article NASCAR Mailbag: Does the sport need an engine update?

Next article Sponsor Bass Pro Shops joins Martin Truex Jr. at Joe Gibbs Racing

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

View More & Comment

More from

Tom Errington



Eaton "got it wrong" with initial W Series criticism

W Series

W Series

Eaton "got it wrong" with initial W Series criticism



Hamilton still revisits texts from "great pillar" Lauda

Formula 1

Formula 1

Hamilton still revisits texts from "great pillar" Lauda



DTM finalising hybrid powertrain spec for 2022 debut

DTM

DTM

DTM finalising hybrid powertrain spec for 2022 debut

Latest news



F1 Brazilian GP: Follow FP1 at Interlagos with live timing

Formula 1

F1 Formula 1

Sao Paulo GP

2 min

F1 Brazilian GP: Follow FP1 at Interlagos with live timing



Ferrari says abolishing BoP should be “final goal” of 2030 WEC Hypercar regulations

WEC

WEC WEC

Bahrain

21 min

Ferrari says abolishing BoP should be “final goal” of 2030 WEC Hypercar regulations



"FIA Rating pushes drivers like me into retirement" - Sebastien Bourdais

WEC

WEC WEC

Bahrain

1 h

"FIA Rating pushes drivers like me into retirement" - Sebastien Bourdais



Nico Rosberg compares Ferrari’s clashes to his own Mercedes F1 rivalry: “The instructions are not clear enough”

Formula 1

F1 Formula 1

Mexican GP

1 h

Nico Rosberg compares Ferrari’s clashes to his own Mercedes F1 rivalry: “The instructions are not clear enough”

Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.

From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.

You have 2 options:

Subscribe now Already subscribed? Sign in here

Already disabled your adblocker?
Reload page

Manage Alerts

Subscribe