Skip to main content

Recommended for you

Cadillac F1 team "not distracted" by Sergio Perez to Williams rumours

Formula 1
Cadillac F1 team "not distracted" by Sergio Perez to Williams rumours

What to expect when expecting Spire prospect Tristan McKee

NASCAR Truck
Richmond
What to expect when expecting Spire prospect Tristan McKee

Foyt, Homes for Our Troops, and White House Historical Association team up for Freedom 250

IndyCar
Washington, D.C.
Foyt, Homes for Our Troops, and White House Historical Association team up for Freedom 250

Marcin Budkowski spoke to 'over half' the F1 grid before choosing Cadillac

Formula 1
Marcin Budkowski spoke to 'over half' the F1 grid before choosing Cadillac

Josh Berry has momentum but no 2027 NASCAR contract yet

NASCAR Cup
Iowa
Josh Berry has momentum but no 2027 NASCAR contract yet

Graeme Lowdon's shock Cadillac exit wasn't a "mutual decision" - Dan Towriss

Formula 1
Graeme Lowdon's shock Cadillac exit wasn't a "mutual decision" - Dan Towriss

Ty Gibbs’s crew chief says practice runs proved viability of bold two-tire calls

NASCAR Cup
Iowa
Ty Gibbs’s crew chief says practice runs proved viability of bold two-tire calls

NASCAR CEO Steve O’Donnell is ready to bring a race to Europe

NASCAR Cup
NASCAR CEO Steve O’Donnell is ready to bring a race to Europe

FIA comment on GPMA statement

In addition to the press release issued today by GPMA offering to put up 10 million euros for four years, the FIA has just received a letter from Professor Goeschel "on behalf of the GPMA" offering to put up 15 million euros for five years subject ...

In addition to the press release issued today by GPMA offering to put up 10 million euros for four years, the FIA has just received a letter from Professor Goeschel "on behalf of the GPMA" offering to put up 15 million euros for five years subject to certain conditions. The FIA is hoping the GPMA will clarify this rather confusing situation and will identify the six manufacturers referred to in their press release.

It has repeatedly been explained to the GPMA that if engine development is to continue, as desired by some GPMA members, the independent teams must be guaranteed a supply of competitive engines.

This means that at least 15 million euros must be available for engine development each year. This would enable the FIA to issue an invitation to tender to potential engine suppliers which is sufficient to cover the necessary development costs.

Had GPMA wished to continue engine development they would have had to find this money, the 40 million euros they offered was wholly inadequate.

Some members of the GPMA are apparently still having difficulty with the word 'proposal' and also with understanding that starving the independent teams of competitive engines is not in the interests of Formula One.

The result of all this is that the rules will stay as published and agreed. As always, all agreements, including the Concorde Agreement, will be adhered to and enforced.

The positive aspect is that all the manufacturers involved can now concentrate on important and relevant future technologies in Formula One which they have been invited to discuss with the FIA. This means that they can stop wasting vast sums of money trying to make the existing engines even faster than they are already.

-fia-

Previous article French GP results
Next article Schumacher claims pole in French GP qualifying

Top Comments

Latest news