Skip to main content

Recommended for you

David Coulthard explains why F1 race engineer relationship is “more than professional”

Formula 1
Saudi Arabian GP
David Coulthard explains why F1 race engineer relationship is “more than professional”

McLaren’s 'new car' upgrade raises hopes of Mercedes fight at Miami GP

Formula 1
Miami GP
McLaren’s 'new car' upgrade raises hopes of Mercedes fight at Miami GP

Lewis Hamilton given Ferrari vote of confidence by Martin Brundle

Formula 1
Miami GP
Lewis Hamilton given Ferrari vote of confidence by Martin Brundle

Isack Hadjar admits Red Bull F1 promotion still feels "weird"

Formula 1
Saudi Arabian GP
Isack Hadjar admits Red Bull F1 promotion still feels "weird"

Everything you wanted to know about Carson Hocevar's Talladega celebration

NASCAR Cup
Talladega
Everything you wanted to know about Carson Hocevar's Talladega celebration

Winners and losers from a tense NASCAR Cup race at Talladega

NASCAR Cup
Talladega
Winners and losers from a tense NASCAR Cup race at Talladega

Can Miami really be the start of a 'new' F1 season?

Feature
Formula 1
Feature
Miami GP
Can Miami really be the start of a 'new' F1 season?

Arrow McLaren has "no fear" in running all four primary Indy 500 cars at Open Test

IndyCar
Arrow McLaren has "no fear" in running all four primary Indy 500 cars at Open Test

FIA comment on GPMA statement

In addition to the press release issued today by GPMA offering to put up 10 million euros for four years, the FIA has just received a letter from Professor Goeschel "on behalf of the GPMA" offering to put up 15 million euros for five years subject ...

In addition to the press release issued today by GPMA offering to put up 10 million euros for four years, the FIA has just received a letter from Professor Goeschel "on behalf of the GPMA" offering to put up 15 million euros for five years subject to certain conditions. The FIA is hoping the GPMA will clarify this rather confusing situation and will identify the six manufacturers referred to in their press release.

It has repeatedly been explained to the GPMA that if engine development is to continue, as desired by some GPMA members, the independent teams must be guaranteed a supply of competitive engines.

This means that at least 15 million euros must be available for engine development each year. This would enable the FIA to issue an invitation to tender to potential engine suppliers which is sufficient to cover the necessary development costs.

Had GPMA wished to continue engine development they would have had to find this money, the 40 million euros they offered was wholly inadequate.

Some members of the GPMA are apparently still having difficulty with the word 'proposal' and also with understanding that starving the independent teams of competitive engines is not in the interests of Formula One.

The result of all this is that the rules will stay as published and agreed. As always, all agreements, including the Concorde Agreement, will be adhered to and enforced.

The positive aspect is that all the manufacturers involved can now concentrate on important and relevant future technologies in Formula One which they have been invited to discuss with the FIA. This means that they can stop wasting vast sums of money trying to make the existing engines even faster than they are already.

-fia-

Previous article French GP results
Next article Schumacher claims pole in French GP qualifying

Top Comments

Latest news