Horner: No better time for reverse-grid experiment

Red Bull boss Christian Horner says Formula 1 will never have a better opportunity to try a reverse-grid format than the double-header events this year, as he urged Mercedes to not block the plan.

Horner: No better time for reverse-grid experiment

F1 teams are in the final stages of planning for the season to finally get going in Austria on July 5, and talks have advanced with the sport's owners about what needs to be done for the challenges ahead.

During a teleconference call on Friday, one idea discussed was for a different format to be used at the second of the double-header events being planned for Austria, Britain and some venues later in the year.

The idea that gained most traction was for a reverse grid sprint race on the Saturday that would be used to decide the grid for the grand prix on the Sunday. The starting position for the reverse grid event would be based on reverse championship order.

But despite a majority of teams supporting the plan, Mercedes indicated that it was not in favour of the idea, with the Racing Point outfit also understood to have wanted more time to think about what it would prefer to do.

With the rule needing unanimous support to happen, if Mercedes does not change its mind then the idea will have to be dropped.

Horner thinks that not going ahead with the reverse-grid plan would be a huge lost opportunity for F1, amid concerns that the sport needs something to generate more interest at the second races of the double-headers.

"I think you're never going to get a better opportunity than the back-to-back races that we have at venues like Austria, Silverstone and potentially one later in the year," Horner told Motorsport.com.

"The problem is I think that if we just repeat the same format at the same venue, the result is likely to be very similar.

"I think we've got an ideal opportunity to try something different. And as long as it's clear going into the championship from the first race, and it's not something that changes during the season, then we certainly wouldn't have an issue with that.

"Unfortunately, there was one team that was against. So it will be a shame to lose that opportunity."

While Horner said he could understand why reigning champion Mercedes would be against a rule that potentially puts it at the back of the grid, he urged its team boss Toto Wolff to put his concerns aside.

"We've won the Austrian GP for the last two years so we have potentially as much to lose, particularly at that venue," added Horner.

"I think it will be an overall positive for F1. I think you're not going to get a better opportunity where we're at the same venue for two consecutive weekends to try something different.

"I don't see quite the appeal being as large to tune in to a rerun of effectively the same event one week later.

"If there's a different format that just makes it more appealing, more enticing and I hope that Mercedes will support this in the end. At the end of the day it is the same challenge for all drivers and all teams."

Horner said that there were very limited options of what F1 could do for the second race if the reverse grid format did not get the go ahead.

"If a facility has the ability to run a different layout you could look at that, but I don't think that exists in Austria," he said.

"That's about the only thing you could do, running circuits round the other way. But obviously from a safety point of view it wouldn't be possible. They're not designed from a safety point of view to accommodate that.

"Potentially Silverstone has different layouts, but it would be a shame if this opportunity [for reverse grid races] wasn't used to its maximum. This is a perfect opportunity to look at something different for the future as well."

shares
comments

Banned: How F1 finally overcame blown floor trickery

Can new rules save F1 as we know it?

Why Albon won't be "throwing around laptops" to gain a 2023 F1 edge

Why Albon won't be "throwing around laptops" to gain a 2023 F1 edge

Prime
Prime
Formula 1
Williams launch
Alex Kalinauckas

Why Albon won't be "throwing around laptops" to gain a 2023 F1 edge Why Albon won't be "throwing around laptops" to gain a 2023 F1 edge

The pioneering F1 car that preceded Lotus’s terminal decline

The pioneering F1 car that preceded Lotus’s terminal decline

Prime
Prime
Formula 1
GP Racing

Throwback: The 1987 Lotus 99T The pioneering F1 car that preceded Lotus’s terminal decline

How Tyrrell became a racing Rubik’s cube as it faded out of F1

How Tyrrell became a racing Rubik’s cube as it faded out of F1

Prime
Prime
Formula 1
GP Racing

The story of Ken Tyrrell's team How Tyrrell became a racing Rubik’s cube as it faded out of F1

Assessing Hamilton's remarkable decade as a Mercedes F1 driver

Assessing Hamilton's remarkable decade as a Mercedes F1 driver

Prime
Prime
Formula 1
Alex Kalinuackas

Assessing Hamilton's Mercedes stint Assessing Hamilton's remarkable decade as a Mercedes F1 driver

Why new-look Haas is a litmus test for Formula 1’s new era

Why new-look Haas is a litmus test for Formula 1’s new era

Prime
Prime
Formula 1
Jonathan Noble

Why new-look Haas is a litmus test Why new-look Haas is a litmus test for Formula 1’s new era

The Mercedes F1 pressure changes under 10 years of Toto Wolff

The Mercedes F1 pressure changes under 10 years of Toto Wolff

Prime
Prime
Formula 1
Alex Kalinauckas

Assessing Wolff's Mercedes influence The Mercedes F1 pressure changes under 10 years of Toto Wolff

The all-French F1 partnership that Ocon and Gasly hope to emulate

The all-French F1 partnership that Ocon and Gasly hope to emulate

Prime
Prime
Formula 1
GP Racing

The line-up Ocon, Gasly may emulate The all-French F1 partnership that Ocon and Gasly hope to emulate

Who were the fastest drivers in F1 2022?

Who were the fastest drivers in F1 2022?

Prime
Prime
Formula 1
GP Racing

Who were the fastest F1 drivers? Who were the fastest drivers in F1 2022?