Skip to main content

Recommended for you

Kyle Petty on Hendrick Motorsports' struggles: ‘There’s no magic bullet’

NASCAR Cup
Kyle Petty on Hendrick Motorsports' struggles: ‘There’s no magic bullet’

Cadillac hires new F1 team boss, Graeme Lowdon leaves

Formula 1
Cadillac hires new F1 team boss, Graeme Lowdon leaves

North Wilkesboro to host 2027 All-Star Race, losing points race as Dover returns

NASCAR Cup
North Wilkesboro to host 2027 All-Star Race, losing points race as Dover returns

Why McLaren feels the best drivers can still make a difference under F1 2026 rules

Formula 1
Why McLaren feels the best drivers can still make a difference under F1 2026 rules

Top 10 rookie seasons in F1

Feature
Formula 1
Feature
Top 10 rookie seasons in F1

F1 2026 mid-season grades: Racing Bulls stuns midfield pack 

Formula 1
F1 2026 mid-season grades: Racing Bulls stuns midfield pack 

MotoGP plans to introduce F1-style budget cap

MotoGP
MotoGP plans to introduce F1-style budget cap

Jessica Hawkins dismisses F1 strength concerns but flags junior series barrier for female drivers

Formula 1
Jessica Hawkins dismisses F1 strength concerns but flags junior series barrier for female drivers
Breaking news

Slashing downforce could leave F1 "no better off" - Symonds

Formula 1 technical expert Pat Symonds has warned it would be “all too easy” for rulemakers to slash downforce levels and fail to improve racing.

Renault Sport F1 Team R.S. 18 front wing detail

As F1 evaluates ways to create a better spectacle following criticism that cars are too downforce-dependent and overtaking is too difficult, Toro Rosso team boss Franz Tost suggested downforce levels should be cut by “at least 40-50%”.

He argued that only the drivers benefit from the current generation of cars that have immensely high cornering speeds.

Countering Tost’s suggestion at the Autosport International Show, title-winning technical boss-turned-F1 employee Symonds said removing downforce is “certainly doable” but a misguided solution.

“Often when you’re trying to get your head around an argument you should take it to an extreme and see what answer you get,” he acknowledged.

“If you go to the extreme of having no downforce, you’d say well that’s got to be better because you can’t lose something that isn’t there.

“So there’s some logic in the argument.

“However, it’s much more complex than that. You could produce a car with half the downforce of a current Formula 1 car but with much, much worse weight characteristics.

“It would be all too easy to do. Then you’d be no better off than you are now.”

Tost’s point was that reducing downforce levels would make it easier for cars to follow, harder to drive through the corners and increase braking distances to promote overtaking.

Symonds agrees that high levels of downforce were negative, and also lamented the lack of entertainment inspired by the emergence of the teams’ tactic of running much slower than is possible during races to complete a one-stop strategy.

“I want the cars to be quick, but I want them to be spectacular,” said Symonds, who is overseeing several projects with F1, one of which is to fundamentally improve overtaking for 2021.

“If they are really nailed to the ground I don’t think they are particularly spectacular.

“A rally car is spectacular. That’s something where you see the thing is absolutely on the edge of stability, it looks difficult to drive, it is difficult to drive.

“A Formula 1 car doesn’t always look too difficult to drive. Particularly at the moment where we’ve got the teams are strategically running at below the maximum performance to reduce the number of pitstops they do.

“Then the cars looking anything but spectacular.”

From the editor, also read:

Previous article Redundancy plans will be "major distraction" for top F1 teams
Next article Verstappen: Day of public service with stewards was “constructive”

Top Comments

Latest news