Racing Point reports £116m loss in first F1 year

The Racing Point Formula 1 team posted a loss of £116m in its first year of operation, but the figures reflect the unusual circumstances of its emergence from the ashes of Force India, and the true operating loss was closer to £25m.

Racing Point reports £116m loss in first F1 year

The higher number has been revealed in the newly published first year accounts for Racing Point, which was established as a new company in August 2018 after Force India went into administration.

Because of that timing, the accounts run from August 2018 to August 2019, whereas usually F1 teams operate in calendar years from January to December, thus fully reflecting the income and costs associated with individual racing seasons. The Racing Point accounts include the final nine races of 2018, and the first 12 of 2019.

The figures reflect the fact that Racing Point paid £90m to acquire the rights and assets associated with the original Force India team, and that the new team also took on the debts of the original company, so that creditors could be paid immediately – and the team would then subsequently be refunded when the administration process was complete.

The accounts also confirm that Stroll provided £142m of the total of £200m share capital, and thus the Canadian owns 71% of the shares, with the rest split between his fellow investors in the consortium he put together.

Income for the period is listed at just £46m – substantially less than the £77m featured in the last published Force India accounts in 2016 – because of the way revenue has been allocated as a result of acquiring the rights to Force India’s F1 prize fund earnings.

The notes to the accounts also confirm that subsequent to the 2018-’19 period a bank loan of £55m was repaid in January 2020, while a £40m installment of share capital was paid in December 2019.

Team principal Otmar Szafnauer stressed that the significant loss on paper did not reflect the true financial picture of Racing Point.

“These accounts are extraordinary and one time only because of the purchase of the team,” he told Motorsport.com.

“So when we're back into a normal accounting cycle you'll never see numbers like this again. This accounting period is an anomaly. It's not normal, so therefore you have to understand the numbers.

“And if we weren't in a position where the team was purchased out of administration, I think our loss would have been £25m in a normal year, not £116m.”

Read Also:

Szafnauer said the fact that a well-run team with good backing still lost a notional £25m indicated that the new Concorde Agreement has to provide an even fairer distribution of income than is currently being tabled.

“It's really, really important for F1 to get the money redistribution right such that a team like ours can have a chance of breaking even,” he said.

“That £25 million in the future should be around zero. So a team like ours can actually run. Remember, we're the most efficient team, we spend the least amount of money still today.

“So for a team that spends the least amount of money, has decent revenue, and is £25m in the hole, that isn't great. So therefore, the money distribution and the cost cap are important to the financial stability in F1. It's getting close to what we want, but it could be better. The upside could be better.

“Financially we're on a much stronger footing than we were as Force India. We don't have to worry about cash flows, paying people, paying for parts, none of that. However, to be able to race at the level we're racing, the cost cap and new money distribution are really important for the health of a mid-grid team like ours.”

Racing Point’s chief financial officer Robert Yeowart stressed that there were exceptional circumstances associated with the team’s first year.

“If you look at the balance sheet, a lot of those figures are heavily inflated because of post administration topics that would go away and never be seen again,” Yeowart told Motorsport.com.

“So when you see the accounts for all of 2020, they will be gone. When we do the accounts in August 2020, the balance sheet will look a lot more normal.

“For example the acquisition was done in such an accelerated way, and we stepped into the shoes of all of the creditors of Force India.

"So for example, we have over £30m in the debtors’ figure which is money that we paid out of this company to pay the creditors of Force India, which we then claim back off the administrators of Force India. By the time we get to August 2020, that's all dealt with, we've sorted all of that out.

“There's also a huge backlog in certain infrastructure costs. IT for example, was under-resourced, two or three years, and actually at breaking point. So in year one, we had to spend a lot on some of those things.”

Yeowart said that overall the business is operating as planned when Stroll and his partners established it, but there’s still a reliance on better income distribution.

“They've capitalised the business, they've put £200m of share capital into the business, which came from a five-year business plan,” he said. “We knew that there would be losses in ‘18, and ‘19 and ‘20. But after that we're expecting to be generating some profit, and be self sustaining on a cash basis.

“And that assumed we would have a budget cap, it assumed we would have a fairer revenue distribution. There are levels of performance assumption and things we have to deliver ourselves, but the sport has to deliver that sort of equality of revenue. And if we don't get that, we will be outside of the capital business plan that we put together.”

Yeowart confirmed that the team hopes to transition to a financial year that runs from January to December: “I would prefer to be on a calendar year, but it's not the easiest thing in the world to plan and action.

“The budget cap and financial regulation started with your audited accounts, so to have an audited set of accounts from August to August is going to be no use for a budget cap point of view.”

shares
comments
The tech fallout from the Racing Point F1 verdict

Previous article

The tech fallout from the Racing Point F1 verdict

Next article

70th Anniversary GP: Bottas grabs pole as Hulkenberg stars

70th Anniversary GP: Bottas grabs pole as Hulkenberg stars
Load comments
The tough balancing act facing Schumacher’s Netflix film producers Prime

The tough balancing act facing Schumacher’s Netflix film producers

Michael Schumacher is the latest sporting superstar to get the ‘Netflix treatment’, with a special documentary film airing on the US streaming giant’s platform this month. DAMIEN SMITH has the inside track on how the filmmakers gained access to tell the human story behind one of Formula 1’s most publicity-shy champions - while the man himself, for obvious reasons, is in absentia… 

Why Verstappen should be confident of Russian GP recovery Prime

Why Verstappen should be confident of Russian GP recovery

For the second race in a row, Mercedes has ended the first day of track action on top. It’s in a commanding position at the Russian Grand Prix once again – this time largely thanks to Max Verstappen’s upcoming engine-change grid penalty. But there’s plenty to suggest all hope is not lost for the championship leader at Sochi...

Formula 1
Sep 24, 2021
Why dumping the MGU-H is the right move for F1 Prime

Why dumping the MGU-H is the right move for F1

OPINION: With its days apparently numbered, the MGU-H looks set to be dropped from Formula 1’s future engine rules in order to entice new manufacturers in. While it may appear a change of direction, the benefits for teams and fans could make the decision a worthwhile call

Formula 1
Sep 23, 2021
The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots Prime

The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots

Team Lotus ceased to exist in 1994 - and yet various parties have been trying to resurrect the hallowed name, in increasingly unrecognisable forms, ever since. Damien Smith brings GP Racing’s history of the legendary team to an end with a look at those who sought to keep the flame alive in Formula 1.

Formula 1
Sep 22, 2021
Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background Prime

Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background

OPINION: Formula 1 reconvenes for the Russian Grand Prix two weeks after the latest blow in ‘Max Verstappen vs Lewis Hamilton’. While the Silverstone and Monza incidents were controversial, they thankfully lacked one element that so far separates the 2021 title fight from the worst examples of ugly championship battles

Formula 1
Sep 22, 2021
How Mika Hakkinen thrived at Lotus Prime

How Mika Hakkinen thrived at Lotus

Mika Hakkinen became Michael Schumacher’s biggest rival in Formula 1 in the late-90s and early 2000s, having also made his F1 debut in 1991. But as MARK GALLAGHER recalls, while Schumacher wowed the world with a car that was eminently capable, Hakkinen was fighting to make his mark with a famous team in terminal decline

Formula 1
Sep 21, 2021
The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey  Prime

The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey 

Before Michael Schumacher – or anyone else – had driven the 191 (or 911 as it was initially called), Eddie Jordan turned to a fellow Irishman to test his new Formula 1 car. JOHN WATSON, a grand prix winner for Penske and McLaren, recalls his role in the birth of a legend…

Formula 1
Sep 20, 2021
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog Prime

The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog

A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says Stuart Codling.

Formula 1
Sep 18, 2021