How a million pound crash highlighted F1’s money squeeze

After a fraught Emilia Romagna GP for Mercedes, one of team boss Toto Wolff’s main frustrations was the potential consequences of the huge accident suffered by Valtteri Bottas.

How a million pound crash highlighted F1’s money squeeze

It was not the lost points that the Austrian was worried about, but the possible impact on the future development programme for the W12 triggered by the cost of the damage. Having taken the wreck apart in Brackley the team has estimated that the final bill will be around £1 million.

It’s an extraordinary notion that mighty Mercedes has to fret about paying for broken parts – engineering chief Andrew Shovlin even highlighted the front wing that was nudged into the tyres by Lewis Hamilton – but the episode highlights just how pressured the top teams are in this new era of FIA financial regulations.

The requirement to spend less than $145m in 2021 on developing, building and running their cars had led to major changes for Mercedes, Red Bull and Ferrari, the three biggest spenders. They’ve all had to trim staff, switch people to other projects, and have a major rethink about how they operate. If you spend too much, there will be penalties, as for any other form of rule-breaking.

“We’ve had to go through the pain of redundancies over the winter,” says Red Bull’s Christian Horner. “We’ve had to re-size, re-package ourselves, and it’s really tough when you’re saying goodbye to members of the team, some of whom have been there for 25 years across its different formats.

“So it’s been really been a tough exercise and continues to be a significant challenge, particularly for the bigger teams. It drives efficiency into the business, because it quite simply has to.”

And a big element of that cost saving is making and using fewer parts across the season. Where possible bits have been redesigned to last longer and complete more race weekends. 

Indeed, Mercedes quietly introduced more steel and thus less carbon into the suspension of the W12 purely for cost reasons - the change has added some weight, but it gives the parts a longer life.

The team also repurposed its W11 chassis as W12s instead of building a run of new examples – for the record Bottas crashed 05.

More than ever before new aero parts have to really earn their place on the car in CFD and the wind tunnel before they go to manufacturing, and there’s a greater focus on managing production. 

There’s no point in being left with half a dozen obsolete Bahrain-spec front wings when a new version comes on stream a few races down the line.

On the other hand if you lose a couple in one day, as Mercedes did at Imola, you may be forced to build unplanned extra versions of the current one to ensure that you have enough spares in stock.

Read Also:

All of this reflects how smaller teams have always been run, because they simply didn’t have enough cashflow. Only three or four years ago a struggling Force India had to justify the cost of every nut and bolt. However it’s a new experience for teams that, within reason, could traditionally spend what they needed to spend.

It also explains why the negotiations over qualifying sprints between the teams, F1 and the FIA dragged on for so long. Three extra races, with by definition a high risk of contact as drivers scramble to make the most of the new format, presented the prospect of extra expense.

“We are really struggling to just come in below the budget cap and we’re talking about tens of thousands of pounds and not hundreds of thousands,” Wolff said in Bahrain before an agreement on sprints was reached.

“Therefore we would really like to support Stefano [Domenicali] and Ross [Brawn] with the idea because I think it’s worth trying.

“But we simply haven’t got the margin to go for it and then find out that there is an extra half million pounds or more that we have to find within that budget cap, because that could mean looking at people again, and that’s not where I want to go any more, at all.”

“We support this in the hope that if it works it generates future revenue, future interest, future benefit into the sport,” said Horner.

“If you divide $145m by 23 events you’re on a crude basis [seeing] what it takes to operate a Grand Prix car, and of course, adding in, effectively albeit a shortened race is just more cost that we’re naturally going to incur the usage of parts, etc, etc.

“And so there just have to be a sensible allowance that takes that into account, because as Toto says, we’re chasing £10,000, £20,000, £30,000 savings at the moment to ensure that we’re hitting the cap.

“And to suddenly have a variable like this is something that just needs to be accommodated. We’re keen to support it, but there needs to be an accommodation.”

That has now been reached, and the teams have been promised extra income from the sprint races. There is also something akin to an insurance policy that will help them pay for crash damage.

The cost of accidents at any other point in the season still has to be absorbed by the teams. So surely they should allow for it?

Of course there is a contingency built into the budget. But this in F1, and everything is taken to the very edge, so that the wiggle room is as tight as possible. Teams often finish a season having lost the odd wing, but without a crash of the scale of that suffered by Bottas last weekend, and which forces them to bin parts that have done just two races and which were scheduled to do many more.

“Our drivers have been incredibly good at getting through seasons without breaking much in recent years,” Andrew Shovlin said on Sunday night. “And certainly the bill in terms of carbon work and metal work will be very extensive from that.

“So we’ll go through and look at what we can actually salvage, and get the cars back together for Portimao. But it is quite a concern when you have these sort of incidents.

“If you have a series of these kind of large accidents that are doing significant damage, and this has been bad for us, because we’ve had a front wing with Lewis as well, then that will definitely exceed our allocation for what we have available to spend on the parts.

“In an ideal world, you run them to life, you don’t break them, anything that you do break, hopefully it’s end of life or something that is about to be obsolete. But that is definitely not the case here.

“So it is really a factor of the cost cap, and the money has got to come from somewhere. Ultimately if it becomes a big problem, it can start to hit your development budget. So we do need to be mindful of that moving forward.

“We are very stretched on cost cap. And what we always feared is a total write off of a car. Now this one is not going to be a total write-off, but almost, and that is not something we really wanted.”

Marshals clear the damaged car of Valtteri Bottas, Mercedes W12, from the gravel trap

Marshals clear the damaged car of Valtteri Bottas, Mercedes W12, from the gravel trap

Photo by: Charles Coates / Motorsport Images

Mercedes shipped what was left of the car back to the UK for a more detailed examination. The early indications are that the chassis can eventually return to action, while the power unit – not part of the cost cap but significant in terms of future grid penalties – has also survived.

However much else has been binned, and parts that were earmarked for later use taken off the shelves in the stores.

At the moment there is no immediate need for Mercedes to change its development schedule. It’s a moving target anyway, as the team doesn’t know how the fight with Red Bull will unfold, and thus how long it will have to keep pushing on with bringing upgrades. The ongoing 2022 project will inevitably require more and more attention.

What the crash has done is eaten into the aforementioned contingency that was factored into the team’s planning. Another huge crash in the course of what is F1’s longest ever season could lead to a genuine squeeze late in the year.

A further complication is that the cap allows for a full season of 23 races. There’s a reasonable chance that some will fall by the wayside in the coming months, and the cap will in turn be trimmed to reflect that – but only if events are cancelled with a reasonable warning, and teams haven’t already spent cash directly related to them. Lost races will also mean reduced income for F1, and hence the teams.

The most painful prospect for the teams is that the cap drops to $140m next year, the first season with the new regulations, and then to $135m in 2023. By then the likes of McLaren, Alpine and Aston Martin will all be pushing hard up against it.

Teams will thus become ever more nervous about the cost of crash damage. Whereas in the past a big shunt in qualifying would lead observers to speculate about gearbox grid penalties or a pitlane start after chassis swap, now we’ll be thinking about the financial consequences.

It’s worth considering too how cost considerations might affect future driver choices. Given the constraints, will a top team now take the risk of hiring a rookie, or even someone in their second season and still on a steep learning curve and trying hard to impress?

The cost cap has added an intriguing element to the sport, and while you might find it frustrating that your favourite team has its hands tied, there is a bigger picture – without it there was a good chance that we would not have 20 cars on the grid in years to come. And as Wolff’s frustration makes clear, it is already reining in the top teams and closing up the grids.

It also adds an extra edge to the relentless competitive battle between the teams. F1 used to be an outright spending war, but now it’s a question of who can use their money efficiently. And who is smart enough to submit to the FIA a final reckoning for 2021 as close as possible $144,999,999…

shares
comments

Related video

Suzuka gets new three-year deal to host Japanese GP
Previous article

Suzuka gets new three-year deal to host Japanese GP

Next article

Wolff expecting "totally disjointed" F1 field in 2022

Wolff expecting "totally disjointed" F1 field in 2022
Load comments
Why the lack of "needle" between Red Bull and Ferrari in F1 2022 is a mirage Prime

Why the lack of "needle" between Red Bull and Ferrari in F1 2022 is a mirage

OPINION: The fight for the 2022 Formula 1 world titles between Red Bull and Ferrari so far features little of the public animosity that developed between the former and Mercedes last year. But that isn’t to say things are full on friendly or won’t get much worse very quickly…

The underdog F1 squad that thrust Senna into the limelight Prime

The underdog F1 squad that thrust Senna into the limelight

The Toleman TG184 was the car that could, according to legend, have given Ayrton Senna his first F1 win but for Alain Prost and Jacky Ickx at Monaco in 1984. That could be stretching the boundaries of the truth a little, but as STUART CODLING explains, the team's greatest legacy was in giving the Brazilian prodigy passed over by bigger outfits an opportunity

Formula 1
May 16, 2022
Why Aston Martin is unlikely to repeat Jaguar’s F1 mistakes Prime

Why Aston Martin is unlikely to repeat Jaguar’s F1 mistakes

Two famous manufacturer teams born out of humble midfield origins, splashing the cash while attempting to rise to the top of F1 in record time. There are clear parallels between Lawrence Stroll’s Aston Martin and the doomed Jaguar Racing project of 22 years ago, but Mark Gallagher believes struggling Aston can avoid a similar fate.

Formula 1
May 15, 2022
How rejuvenated Haas recovered its F1 mojo Prime

How rejuvenated Haas recovered its F1 mojo

US-owned but until recently Russian-backed, Haas seems to have reached a turning point in car performance after three gruesome seasons. And it needs to if it’s to attract fresh investment. Team boss Gunther Steiner tells Oleg Karpov how close Haas came to the abyss.

Formula 1
May 14, 2022
How F1 race leaders have now lost their comfort blanket Prime

How F1 race leaders have now lost their comfort blanket

As Formula 1 teams have settled down in understanding the new generation of cars and the way they need to maximise their performance, fresh lessons have emerged. Jonathan Noble investigates how they have brought with them an all-new kind of grand prix racing

Formula 1
May 12, 2022
Gilles Villeneuve's 10 greatest F1 drives Prime

Gilles Villeneuve's 10 greatest F1 drives

Formula 1 lost one of its brightest stars when Gilles Villeneuve was killed during practice for the 1982 Belgian Grand Prix. Forty years on, Motorsport.com picks out the greatest drives by a Ferrari legend

Formula 1
May 11, 2022
The silver lining of Ferrari’s Miami GP defeat Prime

The silver lining of Ferrari’s Miami GP defeat

OPINION: Much was made of Formula 1’s first Miami Grand Prix – what turned out to be a very ‘marmite’ event for both those in attendance and everyone following on TV. But even as the on-track battle between Red Bull and Ferrari it produced continued the negative run of results for the red team, it contained a glimmer it must hope continues to shine

Formula 1
May 11, 2022
How imperfect Miami offered F1's drivers a unique challenge Prime

How imperfect Miami offered F1's drivers a unique challenge

OPINION: Despite all of the stylistic embellishments festooning Formula 1's inaugural Miami Grand Prix, the Miami International Autodrome offered the drivers a unique challenge and punished driver errors; a stark contrast to the usual cast of modern-day circuits

Formula 1
May 10, 2022