Skip to main content

Recommended for you

Mercedes told to speed up F1 upgrades as Ferrari pressure builds

Formula 1
Austrian GP
Mercedes told to speed up F1 upgrades as Ferrari pressure builds

Naturally aspirated V8 vs turbo: Why the 2031 engine debate remains a complicated puzzle

Formula 1
Austrian GP
Naturally aspirated V8 vs turbo: Why the 2031 engine debate remains a complicated puzzle

F1 drivers' dinner photo sends fans into frenzy before Austrian GP

Formula 1
Austrian GP
F1 drivers' dinner photo sends fans into frenzy before Austrian GP

Luca Marini negotiating move to Tech3 KTM for 2027

MotoGP
Dutch GP
Luca Marini negotiating move to Tech3 KTM for 2027

Why everyone suddenly wants a piece of Alpine

Feature
Formula 1
Feature
Why everyone suddenly wants a piece of Alpine

Fermin Aldeguer ruled out of Dutch GP after fracture

MotoGP
Dutch GP
Fermin Aldeguer ruled out of Dutch GP after fracture

How the Spa 24 Hours became a GT race in 2001

GT World Challenge Europe Endurance
24h of Spa
How the Spa 24 Hours became a GT race in 2001

BMW M3 Touring 24H spotted at Spa with roof box

GT World Challenge Europe Endurance
CrowdStrike 24 Hours of Spa
BMW M3 Touring 24H spotted at Spa with roof box

Fry supports technology development

The debate about technological advancements versus safety is a long-running one in F1. Some believe the technology that helps the cars go faster undermines the safety aspect while others argue the opposite, that technology makes the sport even ...

The debate about technological advancements versus safety is a long-running one in F1. Some believe the technology that helps the cars go faster undermines the safety aspect while others argue the opposite, that technology makes the sport even safer.

Gil de Ferran and Nick Fry.
Photo by xpb.cc.

Speed-reducing measures such as next year's 2.4 litre V8 engine are being introduced but while he advocates a balance between speed and safety, BAR chief executive Nick Fry thinks restricting technology too much would be detrimental the sport.

"Clearly, we have to respect safety," Fry said at the Global Motorsports Congress near Frankfurt. "It's very difficult to understand sitting outside just how brutal the cars are. On the other hand, the important point is the application of technology. Companies like Michelin, Honda, BMW, Mercedes are in this for development of technology."

"If technology was taken away, if it was a much lower tech formula, I think the interest of F1 to Honda, BMW, Mercedes and companies, technological partners and indeed many of the sponsors would be reduced significantly."

Fry stressed that F1 should maintain its status. "Formula One must remain at the pinnacle of motor sports," he remarked. "We do have a concern that the front-running GP2 cars could probably be as quick if not quicker than rear-of-the-grid F1. We need to make sure F1 is a formula for heroes. These cars should not be too easy to drive."

"The concern will be at the beginning of next year when we're learning. I think most manufacturers have a target of 750 horsepower and that will be difficult from a 2.4 litre engine with even further restrictions on the use of materials. But I have 100 percent confidence that we'll get the performance back very quickly."

The BAR chief also possibly let slip the new name of the Brackley outfit now that Honda has taken over. It's not yet been revealed what the team will run as next year but 'Honda Racing F1 Team' was spotted on the screen during Fry's presentation. "Maybe," he hedged when asked if he had given the game away.

Previous article Renault V8 on target
Next article Minardi Vallelunga test notes 2005-11-21

Top Comments

Latest news