Formula 1
Formula 1
R
Emilia Romagna GP
18 Apr
Race in
44 days
09 May
Next event in
62 days
23 May
Race in
79 days
R
Azerbaijan GP
06 Jun
Race in
93 days
13 Jun
Race in
101 days
27 Jun
Race in
114 days
04 Jul
Next event in
118 days
18 Jul
Race in
135 days
R
Hungarian GP
01 Aug
Race in
149 days
29 Aug
Race in
177 days
05 Sep
Race in
184 days
12 Sep
Race in
191 days
26 Sep
Race in
205 days
R
Singapore GP
03 Oct
Next event in
209 days
10 Oct
Race in
219 days
R
United States GP
24 Oct
Race in
234 days
31 Oct
Race in
241 days
R
Australian GP
21 Nov
Race in
261 days
R
Saudi Arabia GP
05 Dec
Race in
275 days
R
Abu Dhabi GP
12 Dec
Race in
282 days
Motorsport.com's Prime content
Topic

Motorsport.com's Prime content

How Hamilton's latest storm hints at a bigger problem

Lewis Hamilton has made headlines again this week for a slip of the tongue that he instantly corrected. He couldn't have addressed the error any faster, so why is there so much outcry?

How Hamilton's latest storm hints at a bigger problem

Every person who has criticised Lewis Hamilton for fleetingly referring to his hometown of Stevenage as a "slum" is perfect. Or they are hypocrites. It must be one or the other, given the speed and power with which Hamilton was slammed for a slip of the tongue that he almost immediately, in the moment, acknowledged was the wrong word.

One word. "Slums". That's all some people, who deserve medals if they have never made a verbal blunder in their life, needed to round on a five-time world champion.

"It's been a really, really long journey and it really was a dream for us all as a family to do something different," said Hamilton at last Sunday's BBC Sports Personality of the Year awards ceremony. "To, kind of, for us, to get out of the slums - well, not the slums, but to get out of somewhere and do something..."

Note the immediate correction. It's not forced, or even a delayed response - it's an instantaneous 'Ah, that's not right'. Hamilton's had qualifying advantages this season bigger than the time it took for him to realise he'd used the wrong word and correct himself.

Sadly, though, in the current climate, particularly where Hamilton is concerned, the damage was already done. It was headline news on the websites of five major British newspapers and the BBC, countless other websites in the UK and around the world, and featured in at least two of the British broadcaster's main radio shows as well.

All because Hamilton had briefly used a word that he swiftly attempted to address, and is also not particularly uncommon to hear used in that mildly sarcastic context. Does anyone seriously think Hamilton considers Stevenage to be a favela?

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1

Photo by: Steven Tee / LAT Images

No, but it did afford a chance to drag down a sporting icon, and so naturally it was seized, from offended locals, to the grandstanding Stevenage council leader seeing a moment to play to the gallery and taking it, and to the factions of the media that benefit from putting Hamilton on a pedestal just to tear him down.

"I chose the wrong words, but I didn't mean anything by it," said Hamilton when, in a video since deleted from his Instagram account, he felt compelled to address the ongoing criticism two days afterwards. That's easy to believe. Unfortunately, so is the idea that those who picked up a bat to beat him with definitely did mean something by their words.

This entire incident has been blown immeasurably out of proportion and it is not the first time Hamilton's found himself at the centre of a storm. Sometimes it's justified – it was almost a year ago he made his 'princess dress' blunder – but often it is not. From private plane usage, to where he lives and pays his taxes, even to the FIA prize-giving ceremonies. Last year Hamilton was a disrespectful guest for turning up not in black tie, and this year the same for wearing green trousers – but, look, there's Kimi Raikkonen, on stage and very drunk. What a guy!

Imagine if those positions were reversed? And it's far from the only example of a concentrated bias of negativity towards Hamilton. If the answer to why that is happening so regularly is 'Maybe Hamilton's just unlikeable?' then something doesn't quite add up. Despite his accomplishments, status as an F1 great and Britain's most successful F1 driver and several redeeming qualities as a person (which is also important), he remains either very unpopular or prone to unique levels of judgement.

Now's the time for some soul-searching. At its worst, it's part of the Raheem Sterling issue's insidious rhetoric that exploded into the public consciousness last week. Manchester City and England footballer Sterling contests that parts of the media "fuel racism" because of how they are portraying different ethnicities in the game.

In the examples he gave, comparing coverage of two City players - white 18-year-old Phil Foden and black 21-year-old Tosin Adarabioyo - buying houses, Sterling said that "just by the way it has been worded, this young black kid is looked at in a bad light".

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes-AMG F1, Toto Wolff, Executive Director (Business), Mercedes AMG

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes-AMG F1, Toto Wolff, Executive Director (Business), Mercedes AMG

Photo by: FIA

It's very dangerous ground to point to racial undertones without proof but it is important to try to establish what subconscious motivations there might be. Not every ignorance is obvious. Questioning why problems like this, challenging our reasons for thinking in a certain way and acknowledging that we are all culpable for certain societal ills is important. As is questioning the media's role in it all because society and the media influence and reflect one another.

Regardless of whether it is deliberate, considered, concealed or misunderstood, the feeling that the criticism regularly thrown Hamilton's way is tinged with racism will not fade. It's not the same as Sterling being screamed at, or hearing racist chants in football grounds, because that's a far more aggressive, obvious and in-your-face form of abuse. However, the subtle stuff is still significant.

Some of Hamilton's criticism will be caused by simple annoyance at one driver dominating F1, taking issue with a particular thing he said in the media or an incident on-track. However, some will also be because he is not a 'traditional' F1 driver or champion, and this is where the lines get blurry.

What exactly about him is different? Chiefly it's the colour of his skin, his background, his lifestyle and his growing status as a cultural icon. Are those factors, and what they represent, prompting the angry responses from people? Not all of them, no. Of course not. But some of them, at least, will be motivated in this way, partly because Hamilton - like Sterling - is a representative of a group thought of as 'lesser' in some circles.

The way Hamilton and Sterling get dragged down for pitiful reasons suggests that their rise does not sit well with people of a certain mentality. As Ian Wright put it during the Sterling debate: "It's almost like they don't want him to continue to be a success."

Similarly, there inevitably people who want to dislike Hamilton, and moments like Sunday are an opportunity to verbalise that, and for others to pander to that process. Jump on the bandwagon as a media outlet and you bank an easy win.

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1

Photo by: Zak Mauger / LAT Images

That attitude continued after the video Hamilton posted to address the issue, too. The Sun called it a "grovelling apology" while Sky News referred to it as "lukewarm". It simply cannot be both, it's just being interpreted to suit their chosen narratives. The only unity is both angles are negative. All this does is alienate Hamilton, block out his good attributes and focus on bad elements. And that just fosters an ongoing feeling of negativity and anger, doubly so if there is an ethnic divide between the aggressor and the victim.

Former England footballer John Barnes, weighing in on the Sterling debate, drew parallels between the issue of the portrayal of "Muslim terrorists, Nigerian conmen, Yardie drug gangs or Muslim paedophile/grooming gangs". His point was that the negative coverage and association of a particular group's involvement in certain actions has no bearing on how badly we view the action itself, but it does slowly lower the opinion of the group involved. Barnes described it as a "very subliminal, subtle way of indoctrination".

The same applies to the onslaught of over-the-top criticism of Hamilton, especially as he is not just a black F1 driver who came from a modest background - he's the black F1 driver who came from a modest background.

Maybe Hamilton has not thought about this in such a way. Maybe he has and thinks it's nonsense. Or maybe, whether he has thought about it, or would be willing to think about it, he would be as open and forthright as Sterling was.

Hamilton's request was that "if you have feelings about a mistake I made on stage, don't bother with it, throw it to the side, it's negative energy you don't need to hold". Perhaps that applies to this argument as well.

We do not, and cannot, share Hamilton's experience. Please trust that this is being written fully in the knowledge that the position of a privileged white male is a considerable distance away from Hamilton's. And it is important to note that Sterling spoke as a representative for a massive collective of black players in a sport where exposure to racism is still worryingly common, hence the huge response it triggered.

A final thought is that, while Hamilton's words in his Instagram video were clearly heartfelt, one cannot help but wish to hear what would he would have to say if he could address the wider context his criticism exists within.

Hamilton's input to the debate would be dearly valuable. Well beyond that of addressing something that should never have been an issue to start with.

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 in the press conference

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 in the press conference

Photo by: Jerry Andre / Sutton Images

shares
comments
Renault surprised not to fight McLaren in 2018

Previous article

Renault surprised not to fight McLaren in 2018

Next article

Force India boss Szafnauer could have left in summer

Force India boss Szafnauer could have left in summer
Load comments

About this article

Series Formula 1
Drivers Lewis Hamilton
Author Scott Mitchell
How Ferrari plans to recover from its 2020 F1 nightmare Prime

How Ferrari plans to recover from its 2020 F1 nightmare

The 2020 Formula 1 season was Ferrari's worst for 40 years as it slumped to sixth in the standings. A repeat performance will not be acceptable for the proud Italian team, which has adopted a notably pragmatic approach to forging its path back to the top

Why Aston Martin’s arrival is more than just new green livery Prime

Why Aston Martin’s arrival is more than just new green livery

In the most eagerly anticipated Formula 1 team launch of the season, the rebranded Aston Martin squad’s changes go much further than the striking paint job. But rather than a restart, the team hopes to build on top of solid foundations.

The car Aston Martin begins its new F1 journey with Prime

The car Aston Martin begins its new F1 journey with

The team formerly known as Racing Point gambled successfully on a Mercedes look-alike in 2020 as it mounted a strong challenge for third in the constructors' race and won the Sakhir GP. Now clothed in British racing green, Aston Martin's first Formula 1 challenger since 1960 provides the clearest indicator yet of what to expect from the new-for-2021 regulations

The tricky driver conundrums facing Mercedes in F1 2021 Prime

The tricky driver conundrums facing Mercedes in F1 2021

Ahead of the new Formula 1 season, reigning world champions Mercedes will take on challenges both old and new. This also can be said for its driver conundrum which could become key to sustaining its ongoing success...

Formula 1
Mar 2, 2021
How Alpine's cure to 2021 F1 rules starts at the front Prime

How Alpine's cure to 2021 F1 rules starts at the front

A new name, new faces and new colours pulls the rebranded Alpine Formula 1 team into a new era while carrying over core elements of its 2020 car. But under the surface there's more than meets the eye with the A521 which hints at how the team will tackle 2021...

Formula 1
Mar 2, 2021
Can Mercedes' W12 retain the team's crown? Prime

Can Mercedes' W12 retain the team's crown?

Replacing Formula 1's fastest car was never going to be an easy feat for Mercedes. Amid the technical rule tweaks to peg back the W12 and its 2021 rivals, the new Mercedes challenger will remain the target to beat

Formula 1
Mar 2, 2021
The pointed note that starts Ferrari's Leclerc vs Sainz era Prime

The pointed note that starts Ferrari's Leclerc vs Sainz era

Ferrari is starting its post-Sebastian Vettel age by welcoming Carlos Sainz in alongside Charles Leclerc. But while Sainz has a tough challenge to match his new teammate, Ferrari is also sending a message that previous intra-team spats must end

Formula 1
Mar 2, 2021
The mantra Ocon must follow to challenge Alonso at Alpine Prime

The mantra Ocon must follow to challenge Alonso at Alpine

OPINION: It's been an uneasy ride for Esteban Ocon since his F1 comeback - and fresh challenges lie in wait as he's joined by double world champion Fernando Alonso in the newly rebranded Alpine team. STUART CODLING sets out a roadmap to success…

Formula 1
Mar 1, 2021