Breaking news

Formula 1

Renault says braking system was used before this season

The Renault Formula 1 team acknowledges its now-illegal braking system was a driver aid but was "absolutely convinced" of its legitimacy because it was introduced before this season.

Scott Mitchell

Scott Mitchell

Edited: Oct 25, 2019, 9:06 PM

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Add as a preferred source

Nico Hulkenberg, Renault F1 Team R.S. 19

Renault was disqualified from the Japanese Grand Prix after a detailed investigation by the FIA led to a decision this week that the team was utilising a braking system that adhered to technical regulations but combined to facilitate a sporting regulations breach.

Read Also:

The French manufacturer opted not to appeal the decision but stands by the system, and team boss Cyril Abiteboul explained Renault had not sought clearance from the FIA for the design itself because "it's a technology that's been used for a while".

"Another party [Racing Point] has decided to ask for an opinion," he said.

"The normal course would have been to ask the FIA to issue a technical directive, or to engage a discussion with us directly, not in the context of a race, not through the stewards. In that case we could have the opportunity to change.

"Before that event of Suzuka, there was never such discussion or speculation regarding the legality of our system.

"[Approaching the FIA] is not something we've done because we were absolutely convinced, as further demonstrated, that we were legal. And we were legal from a technical
perspective."

Abiteboul accepted that "it is a driver aid, but a number of things are a driver aid", highlighting automatic energy recovery system deployment as an example.

"At some point you need to accept there is an element of subjectivity [in the rules]," he added.

"It's been used since so many years that we never thought it could be put into question until what happened presently."

Asked specifically how long Renault has used the system, he replied: "I don't want to go into details but it's not from this season. It's from before."

Abiteboul admitted that Renault needs to have stronger processes when establishing the legality of its ideas.

"Let's not forget it's the second time we're having a situation like this season, which is two times too many," he said.

When announcing their verdict, the stewards wrote that Renault had exploited grey areas in the technical rules but not committed a breach, and it was the combined effect of the system that amounted to a driver aid they deemed unacceptable.

However, Abiteboul said it was important for Renault to be cleared of any wrongdoing per the technical regulations, and suggested the team had fallen foul of a contradiction of rules that are "getting more and more complex".

"We do not deny it is a form of driver aid," he said. "Not to make the car faster, but to reduce the workload of the drivers.

"It was always going to be a bit of a subjective assessment as to how far it is aiding the driver and whether it's acceptable or not.

"The stewards have judged it's not acceptable. So be it. For me it's harsh on the team. It's also even harsher on the drivers because I think it's a very poor recognition of what they are doing.

"It's shedding a negative light on what they are doing, the way they are performing in the car.

"We will see this weekend, we will have the competitiveness we have – it's independent of whatever braking system we have or not."

We want your opinion!

What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?

Take our 5 minute survey.

- The Motorsport.com Team

Read and post comments

Read also :

Share Or Save This Story

Copy link

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Linkedin

Share on Pinterest

Share on Viber

Previous article Mexican GP: Vettel tops FP2 from Verstappen

Next article Mercedes further off the pace than expected - Bottas

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

View More & Comment

More from

Scott Mitchell



Alfa Romeo must do better in "chaotic" races - Vasseur

Formula 1

Formula 1

Alfa Romeo must do better in "chaotic" races - Vasseur



Honda: Verstappen relationship 'like a young Senna'

Formula 1

Formula 1

Honda: Verstappen relationship 'like a young Senna'



Key team personnel shouldn't be F1 boss - Ferrari

Formula 1

Formula 1

Key team personnel shouldn't be F1 boss - Ferrari

More from

Renault F1 Team



On this day: Fernando Alonso wins the world title, Michael Schumacher retires from F1

Formula 1

Formula 1

Brazilian GP

On this day: Fernando Alonso wins the world title, Michael Schumacher retires from F1



“I went back to the car and cried” – Esteban Ocon opens up about his unexpected year on F1 sidelines

Formula 1

Formula 1

“I went back to the car and cried” – Esteban Ocon opens up about his unexpected year on F1 sidelines



You Ask The Questions: Robert Kubica

Formula 1

You Ask The Questions: Robert Kubica

Latest news



Manthey acknowledges IMSA to be "tougher than expected" despite two wins

IMSA

IMSA IMSA 3 h

Manthey acknowledges IMSA to be "tougher than expected" despite two wins



How a philosophy shift brought BMW to new heights in 2026

IMSA

IMSA IMSA 3 h

How a philosophy shift brought BMW to new heights in 2026



Fred Vasseur reveals two costly moments that denied Ferrari US GP double podium

Formula 1

F1 Formula 1

United States GP

4 h

Fred Vasseur reveals two costly moments that denied Ferrari US GP double podium



Cleetus McFarland set to compete full-time for 2027 ARCA championship

ARCA

ARCA ARCA 5 h

Cleetus McFarland set to compete full-time for 2027 ARCA championship

Feature

Discover prime content



A strategic masterclass: How Kimi Antonelli put himself on the cusp of F1 title at the US GP

Formula 1

United States GP

By Jake Boxall-Legge

A strategic masterclass: How Kimi Antonelli put himself on the cusp of F1 title at the US GP



How Verstappen and Antonelli were both “surprised” in United States GP qualifying

Formula 1

United States GP

By Stuart Codling

How Verstappen and Antonelli were both “surprised” in United States GP qualifying



What we learned from Friday practice at the 2026 United States GP

Formula 1

United States GP

By Jake Boxall-Legge

What we learned from Friday practice at the 2026 United States GP



Max Verstappen’s words explained: Why Red Bull’s turnaround is so different this time

Formula 1

United States GP

By Ronald Vording

Max Verstappen’s words explained: Why Red Bull’s turnaround is so different this time

Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.

From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.

You have 2 options:

Subscribe now Already subscribed? Sign in here

Already disabled your adblocker?
Reload page

Manage Alerts

Subscribe