Wolff: Mercedes didn't get all it wanted in Concorde talks
Mercedes boss Toto Wolff says his team did not get all it wanted from Formula 1’s Concorde Agreement talks.

Wolff had openly spoken out recently against the way that Mercedes had been treated in the discussions over the new Concorde Agreement, as he especially felt the German car manufacturer’s contribution to the sport had not been recognised by F1.
But despite his clear unease as the negotiations entered their final phase, in the end Mercedes joined all the other teams in committing to F1 for the next five-year period by signing up.
Reflecting on why Mercedes elected to sign despite not being happy, Wolff said that both his team and F1 had to give way for the good of the sport.
“Look, it is a negotiation at the end of the day,” he said. “I have great respect for Chase Carey and the complications in dealing with all the stakeholders. Everybody will have a different agenda and different objectives.
“On the other side, why I was outspoken was that I felt that Mercedes’ role, particularly in the last seven years, wasn’t maybe recognised in the way I would have wished for in terms of the financial split.
"But on the other side, I think he tried hard to create a better show, to balance the prize fund distribution better, and I think he achieved it.
“Obviously I would have wished a better situation for Mercedes but it is what it is. In the final part of the negotiations we agreed on some compromises that found their way into the agreement, and you know, it’s with every negotiation, at the end of the day if both stand up at the table and are not quite satisfied it’s probably a good outcome.”
Rival Ferrari did come out of the Concorde discussions quite satisfied, though, having kept its long-standing veto over rules as well as securing an extra financial payment for its historical significance to the sport.
But team boss Mattia Binotto accepted that the next phase of F1 would be ‘challenging’ for his team as the budget cap bit.
Speaking about signing up, Binotto said: “I think it’s important for the sport, at first, to have stability and to have clear regulations. Plus new regulations for the future, as well on the financial side.
“I think that the budget cap is certainly very challenging for us, but good for the sport and eventually good as well for the economics of Ferrari, looking at the future.
“I think that having a Concorde Agreement where revenues are more balanced between teams, top teams to small teams, is important as well, to make the sport more sustainable from the financial point of view. So I think these are all good conditions to look very positive for a stronger sport in the future, and hopefully as well a better show."
Wolff said that ultimately the best outcome from the talks was that nobody felt they completely won with the deal.
“I think we are all having the feeling that maybe we could have achieved more,” he said. “But as I said to you, that is maybe an outcome that is good for working together in the future.
“If one party stands up and says ‘I just got the best deal’, the other one will feel aggrieved.”

Previous article
Pirelli denies that it ignores views of F1 drivers
Next article
Belgian GP qualifying as it happened

About this article
Series | Formula 1 |
Teams | Mercedes |
Author | Jonathan Noble |
Wolff: Mercedes didn't get all it wanted in Concorde talks
Trending
How Do Drivers Stay Fit For F1 Grand Prix?
Ronnie Peterson and Jochen Rindt Tribute
#ThinkingForward with Juan Pablo Montoya
The themes to watch in F1's Imola return
Three weeks is a long time in Formula 1, but in the reshaped start to the 2021 season the teams head to Imola to pick things up after the frenetic Bahrain opener. Here's what to look out for and the developments to follow at the Emilia Romagna Grand Prix
The 'new' F1 drivers who need to improve at Imola
After a pandemic-hit winter of seat-swapping, F1 kicked off its season with several new faces in town, other drivers adapting to new environments, and one making a much-anticipated comeback. Ben Anderson looks at who made the most of their opportunity and who needs to try harder…
The delay that quashed Aston Martin’s last F1 venture
Aston Martin’s only previous foray into Formula 1 in the late 1950s was a short-lived and unsuccessful affair. But it could have been so different, says Nigel Roebuck.
Verstappen exclusive: Why lack of titles won't hurt Red Bull's ace
Max Verstappen’s star quality in Formula 1 is clear. Now equipped with a Red Bull car that is, right now, the world title favourite and the experience to support his talent, could 2021 be the Dutchman’s year to topple the dominant force of Lewis Hamilton and Mercedes?
Is Formula 1 as good as it has ever been now?
For many, many years Formula 1 has strived to do and to be better on all fronts. With close competition, a growing fanbase, a stable political landscape and rules in place to encourage sustainability, 2021 is on course to provide an unexpected peak
How Williams’ new structure adheres to a growing F1 trend
Williams held out against the tide for many years but, as MARK GALLAGHER explains, the age of the owner-manager is long gone
When a journeyman driver's F1 career lasted just 800m
Nikita Mazepin’s Formula 1 debut at the Bahrain Grand Prix lasted mere corners before he wiped himself out in a shunt, but his financial backing affords him a full season. Back in 1993 though, Marco Apicella was an F1 driver for just 800m before a first corner fracas ended his career. Here’s the story of his very short time at motorsport’s pinnacle.
How Raikkonen's rapid rise stalled his teammate's F1 career climb
Kimi Raikkonen's emergence as a Formula 1 star in his rookie campaign remains one of the legendary storylines from 2001, but his exploits had an unwanted impact on his Sauber teammate's own prospects. Twenty years on from his first F1 podium at the Brazilian GP, here's how Nick Heidfeld's career was chilled by the Iceman.